Solving e^x + x = c Algebraically

  • Thread starter Thread starter Frillth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E^x
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster attempts to solve the equation e^x + x = c algebraically, expressing a desire for a method beyond graphical solutions. The context involves algebraic manipulation and the challenges associated with isolating variables in transcendental equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants discuss the limitations of algebraic solutions, suggesting that numerical methods may be necessary. Others explore the implications of using approximations, such as series expansions, to derive potential solutions.

Discussion Status

The discussion reflects a range of perspectives on the solvability of the equation, with some participants asserting that no closed-form solution exists. There is also consideration of what the original poster's intent might be regarding the nature of the solution sought.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the ambiguity surrounding the original poster's question, particularly whether it stems from a homework assignment or personal inquiry. The lack of response from the original poster after several days leaves the discussion open-ended.

Frillth
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am looking for a way to solve the equation e^x + x = c, with c being some constant. I know that I could get an answer from graphing, but I would like to know how to solve an equation like this algebraically. How is this possible?

Homework Equations



None.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried manipulating the equation in many ways, but nothing has led to a solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Taking ln to isolate the exponent introduces ln(c-x), which requires exponentiation, which requires ln...

I don't think it can be solved algebraically.
 
Equations like this are solved numerically on a computer. There is no analytic solution.
 
A (admittedly cheap) approximate solution would be this:

Replace [tex]e^x[/tex] by a truncated series approximation.

[tex] <br /> e^x \approx 1 + x + \frac{x^2} 2[/tex]

You now have

[tex] \begin{align*}<br /> \left(1 + x + \frac{x^2} 2 \right) + x & \approx c \\<br /> \frac{x^2} 2 + 2x + \left(1 - c\right) & \approx 0 \\<br /> x^2 + 4x + 2\left(1 - c \right) & \approx 0<br /> \end{align*}[/tex]

Approximate solutions can be found using the quadratic formula. A graph will help you determine which root to use.
BUT
it may be difficult to determine the accuracy of any solution found in this way. I suspect (but have not investigated numerically) that the closer [tex]c[/tex] is to zero, the closer the approximate solution will be to the true solution.

Short of an approach like this there is (as the others have quite ably stated) no closed form way to solve this problem.
 
I wonder about what is really wanted by the teacher in terms of solving this.

I.e., either statdad's approximation, or a numerical solution which converges arbitrarily close to the answer, or a simple "cannot be solved analytically"?
 
"I wonder about what is really wanted by the teacher in terms of solving this."

That's the true rub, isn't it? Of course, I'm not at all sure that the OP was asking a question from a teacher rather than simply one of his/her own investigation. If it came from a teacher or professor I would like to see the original form: I would hope that a teacher would provide a clearer request.
 
statdad said:
... I'm not at all sure that the OP was asking a question from a teacher rather than simply one of his/her own investigation.

Since he has not responded since posing the question 4 days ago, I guess we'll never know for sure.

If the OP shows more interest in getting an answer, I might be willing to spend time explaining how to get an accurate numerical solution.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K