Solving e^z=w in Polar Form | Abs(right hand side)=2 without ln 2 in Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dousin12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the equation \(2e^z=\sqrt{2}+i\sqrt{2}\) in polar form. Participants are examining the implications of the absolute value of the right-hand side and the absence of a natural logarithm term in the solution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to express the right-hand side in polar form and questions why a "ln 2" term is not present in the solution despite the absolute value being 2. Other participants clarify the absolute value and discuss the formatting of LaTeX in their posts.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing clarifications about the absolute value and LaTeX formatting. There is no explicit consensus on the mathematical reasoning yet, but some guidance on LaTeX usage has been offered.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the absolute value of the right-hand side and the correct formatting of mathematical expressions in LaTeX. Participants are addressing these issues without resolving the primary mathematical question.

Dousin12
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


$$2e^z=\sqrt{2}+i\sqrt{2}\\e^z=\frac{\sqrt{2}+i\sqrt{2}}{2} $$
Then i write the right side as polar form and the abs(right hand side)=2 , and then multiplied with an angle. But in the answer there is only pi/4*i. which is the angle i get, but since the abs(right hand side)=2, why isn't there a "ln 2" in the solution?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Dousin12 said:

Homework Statement


[ tex ] 2e^z=\sqrt{2}+i\sqrt{2}\\e^z=\frac{\sqrt{2}+i\sqrt{2}}{2}\\ [ /tex ]
Then i write the right side as polar form and the abs(right hand side)=2 , and then multiplied with an angle. But in the answer there is only pi/4*i. which is the angle i get, but since the abs(right hand side)=2, why isn't there a "ln 2" in the solution?

Please write your TeX/LaTeX properly; I have fixed up the above and have obtained
2e^z=\sqrt{2}+i\sqrt{2}\\e^z=\frac{\sqrt{2}+i\sqrt{2}}{2}
Anyway, the absolute value of the rhs is not 2.

Mod note: I fixed the contents of the original post.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah i saw when i went to bed, :D My bad. I wrote wrong on the calculator

Btw how do i write latex properly? I can't figure out how to do it!
 
Dousin12 said:
Yeah i saw when i went to bed, :D My bad. I wrote wrong on the calculator

Btw how do i write latex properly? I can't figure out how to do it!
If you right click on the equations Ray posted you should see an option to display the latex.
 
2e^z=\sqrt{2}+i\sqrt{2}\\e^z=\frac{\sqrt{2}+i\sqrt{2}}{2}

this is what i see,

HOw to i get it to be latex? I thought just write on both sides?
 
Dousin12 said:
2e^z=\sqrt{2}+i\sqrt{2}\\e^z=\frac{\sqrt{2}+i\sqrt{2}}{2}

this is what i see,

HOw to i get it to be latex? I thought just write on both sides?
<br /> You need to terminate it.
2e^z=\sqrt{2}+i\sqrt{2}\\e^z=\frac{\sqrt{2}+i\sqrt{2}}{2}
 
Dousin12 said:
2e^z=\sqrt{2}+i\sqrt{2}\\e^z=\frac{\sqrt{2}+i\sqrt{2}}{2}

this is what i see,

HOw to i get it to be latex? I thought just write on both sides?
<br /> <br /> In your original submission (still echoed in the panel above my response) you will see that you used &quot;[ tex ] some math [ /tex ]&quot;. The spaces you inserted inside [...] were a mistake: you should have &quot;[t..x] some math [/t..x]&quot; , where &#039;..&#039; means &#039;e&#039;. The rest of your expression was perfectly OK.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K