Solving equations with the Lambert W-function

  • Thread starter Thread starter MHD93
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 2K views
MHD93
Messages
93
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



attached

The Attempt at a Solution



tried to divide the equation by 4^x and other attemptions, but they didn't work
supposing y = 1/2x didn't either work
 

Attachments

  • ???? ?????.PNG
    ???? ?????.PNG
    393 bytes · Views: 462
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't really see a way to solve this mathematically.

Numerically I get 2 roots:
  1. -0.819769544935445
  2. 0.729714973623184
but they don't look like anything recognizable.
 
[itex]4^{x+1}- 4^{1/(2x)+ 1}- 2^x+ 1= 0[/itex]
Can be simplified by observing that [itex]4^{x+1}= 4(4^x)= 4((2^2)^x)= 4((2^x)^2)[/itex] and that [itex]4^{1/(2x)+ 1}= 4(4^{1/2x})= 4((2^2)^{1/2x})= 4(2^{1/x})[/itex]

But it is that 1/x exponent that causes trouble.
 
Mathematica says the equation reduces to this:

2^(2 + 1/x) == 1 +( 7) 2^x

It still has that pesky 1/x.
 
Forgive me! please,, I was given the question wrong!
A little modification makes it so much easier that I solved it

[itex] 4^{x+1}- 4^{(1/2)x + 1}- 2^x + 1= 0[/itex]

This mistake was about to kill me!
I'm sorry
It's solved now, thanks!
 
Mohammad_93 said:
Forgive me! please,, I was given the question wrong!
A little modification makes it so much easier that I solved it

[itex] 4^{x+1}- 4^{(1/2)x + 1}- 2^x + 1= 0[/itex]

This mistake was about to kill me!
I'm sorry
It's solved now, thanks!

Yes, that is a bit easier! :lol:

But the time was not wasted, I've learned a lot about the Lambert W-function, which I never heard of before this. :cool: