MHB Solving for Distinct Vectors of G: $\mathbb{F}_p$, n, and v

  • Thread starter Thread starter jakncoke1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vectors
jakncoke1
Messages
48
Reaction score
1
Let $\mathbb{F}_p$ denote the integers mod p and let n be a positive integer.
Let v be a fixed vector $\in \mathbb{F}_p^{n}$, Let M be a nxn matrix with entries from $\mathbb{F}_p$. Define G:$\mathbb{F}_p^{n} \to \mathbb{F}_p^{n}$ by
G(x) = v + Mx. Define the k-fold composition of G by itself by $G^{1}(x) = G(x)$
and $G^{k+1} = G (G^{k}(x))$ Determine all pairs p,n for which there exists a vector v and a matrix M such that the $p^n$ vectors of $G^{k}(0), k=1,...,p^{n}$ are distinct.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I've solved it but it will take a bit to type the justification for some of the points but contained in the spoiler are general tips for how to think about the problem
This is a pretty interesting question.
Basically it is asking, for which matrix group $GL_{n+1}(F_p)$, can you generate all the elements in $(F_p)^n$ by iterating a matrix (raising it to the power), and get all the elements in $(F_p)^n$.

Basically for which $GL_{n+1}(F_p)$ does there exist an element of order $p^{n}$.
 
Still writing it, hit sumbit by mistake, bear with me.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top