Solving for Work Done When Accelerating a Mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating work done on an object with an initial velocity of 0 m/s, mass of 8.4 kg, traveling 0.495 m in 0.1625 seconds. The acceleration is calculated to be 37.495 m/s², leading to a final velocity of 6.09375 m/s. The work done is computed as 155.925 joules, assuming constant acceleration. Participants emphasize the importance of significant figures in reporting results and suggest algebraic methods for improved accuracy and clarity. The conversation also notes that varying the acceleration pattern could reduce the work required for the same motion.
Jay529
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Need help checking my work and appropriate use of equations.
Relevant Equations
acceleration: s=ut + 1/2 ut^2, final velocity: V= u+at, work done: W=1/2 mv^2
I wanted to make sure these were the correct equations to use for they were not given. I had to research to get this far and only had the below statement to go off.

The problem is an object with initial velocity = "0." It travels 0.495m in 0.1625sec and weights 8.4 kg
or
Initial velocity (u) = 0 m/s, Mass (m) = 8.4 kg, Distance (s) = 0.495 m, Time (t) = 0.1625

Solving for acceleration: 0.495 = 0 + 1/2 * a (0.1625)^2
a= (2*0.495)/ 0.1625^2 = 37.495m/sec^2

Now that I have acceleration
Calculate final velocity: V= 37.495 * .01625 = 6.09375m/s

Solving for Work done: W=1/2 * 8.4 * 6.09375^2 = .5 * 8.4 * 37.125 = 155.925 joules
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are assuming constant acceleration. Is that given?
 
haruspex said:
You are assuming constant acceleration. Is that given?
Yes, I believe.
 
Last edited:
Jay529 said:
Yes, I believe.
Then I get the same result to four significant figures. The mass is only given to two significant figures, so really that is all you can give in the answer.
Had you worked algebraically you would have got some cancellation: ##2m(\frac st)^2##. That allows you to check that the result is dimensionally correct and can improve accuracy. It has many other advantages. It is certainly easier for others to follow.

Btw, if the acceleration pattern can be anything you choose, the motion can be achieved using a quarter of the work.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top