Solving for Work Done When Accelerating a Mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating work done on an object with an initial velocity of 0 m/s, mass of 8.4 kg, traveling 0.495 m in 0.1625 seconds. The acceleration is calculated to be 37.495 m/s², leading to a final velocity of 6.09375 m/s. The work done is computed as 155.925 joules, assuming constant acceleration. Participants emphasize the importance of significant figures in reporting results and suggest algebraic methods for improved accuracy and clarity. The conversation also notes that varying the acceleration pattern could reduce the work required for the same motion.
Jay529
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Need help checking my work and appropriate use of equations.
Relevant Equations
acceleration: s=ut + 1/2 ut^2, final velocity: V= u+at, work done: W=1/2 mv^2
I wanted to make sure these were the correct equations to use for they were not given. I had to research to get this far and only had the below statement to go off.

The problem is an object with initial velocity = "0." It travels 0.495m in 0.1625sec and weights 8.4 kg
or
Initial velocity (u) = 0 m/s, Mass (m) = 8.4 kg, Distance (s) = 0.495 m, Time (t) = 0.1625

Solving for acceleration: 0.495 = 0 + 1/2 * a (0.1625)^2
a= (2*0.495)/ 0.1625^2 = 37.495m/sec^2

Now that I have acceleration
Calculate final velocity: V= 37.495 * .01625 = 6.09375m/s

Solving for Work done: W=1/2 * 8.4 * 6.09375^2 = .5 * 8.4 * 37.125 = 155.925 joules
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are assuming constant acceleration. Is that given?
 
haruspex said:
You are assuming constant acceleration. Is that given?
Yes, I believe.
 
Last edited:
Jay529 said:
Yes, I believe.
Then I get the same result to four significant figures. The mass is only given to two significant figures, so really that is all you can give in the answer.
Had you worked algebraically you would have got some cancellation: ##2m(\frac st)^2##. That allows you to check that the result is dimensionally correct and can improve accuracy. It has many other advantages. It is certainly easier for others to follow.

Btw, if the acceleration pattern can be anything you choose, the motion can be achieved using a quarter of the work.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top