Solving Momentum & Energy Homework: 2 People on Frictionless Ice Sleigh

  • Thread starter Thread starter kky1638
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Momentum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two individuals of different masses jumping out of a sleigh on frictionless ice, raising questions about the final velocity of the sleigh under different scenarios. The subject area includes concepts of momentum and energy conservation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of conservation laws, particularly momentum and energy, to determine the final velocity of the sleigh. There are attempts to set up equations based on these principles, with some questioning the validity of their results, particularly regarding the outcome of u = 0.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing their attempts and questioning the assumptions made about energy conservation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of energy conservation in this context, indicating that momentum is always conserved while energy may not be.

Contextual Notes

There is a discussion about the need for additional equations when energy conservation is not applicable, suggesting that the problem may require careful consideration of the setup and assumptions involved.

kky1638
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two people of different masses are riding in a sleigh on frictionless ice.
One has mass m1 and the other has mass m2.
When they jump out of the sleigh each has speed u respect to the sleigh.

(I). What is the final velocity of the sleigh if they jump simultaneoulsy in the +x direction?
(II). What is the final velocity of the sleigh if one with mass m1 jumps first and
the other person with mass m2 jumps a few seconds later?


Homework Equations



conservation of momentum and energy (I think)


The Attempt at a Solution



I tried using momentum and energy but somehow I ended up having u = 0,
which seems to be wrong. Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

kky1638 said:
Two people of different masses are riding in a sleigh on frictionless ice.
One has mass m1 and the other has mass m2.
When they jump out of the sleigh each has speed u respect to the sleigh.

(I). What is the final velocity of the sleigh if they jump simultaneoulsy in the +x direction?

I tried using momentum and energy but somehow I ended up having u = 0,
which seems to be wrong. Please help!

Hi kky1638! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Show us what you tried, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help. :smile:
 
I tried using momentum conservation and energy conservation.

momentum: (m1 + m2 + M)(Vi) = (m1 + m2)(Vf + u) + (M)(Vf)

(u is the velocity of the people respect to the sleigh
Vi = initial velocity of sleigh and people combined, Vf = final velocity of the sleigh)

energy: 1/2(m1 + m2 + M)(Vi)^2 = 1/2(m1 + m2)(Vf + u)^2 +1/2(M)(Vf)^2

To make calculation a little easier, I let A = m1 + m2
then did some algebra with the two equations and ended up having u = 0,
which I think is definitely wrong.

Part II, I think is doing the same thing I did on Part I twice.
Tell me if I did anything wrong both conceptually and algebraically. Thanks!
 
Hi kky1638! :smile:
kky1638 said:
I tried using momentum conservation and energy conservation.

Tell me if I did anything wrong both conceptually and algebraically.

Yup … energy is not conserved … imagine you're standing on a stationary wheeled thing, and you jump off forwards … is the energy conserved then? :rolleyes:

General principle: energy is never conserved in collisions unless the question says so (or says "perfectly elastic", which is the same thing).

(But momentum is always conserved)​

Look at the number of equations … you need two equations, and sometimes they're conservation of energy and momentum …

so when you don't have conservation of energy, you need one other equation … in this case, the equation for u.

The other side of the coin is that, if you're given an extra equation, like the one for u, then obviously there must be an equation missing, and that is the conservation of energy. :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K