MHB Solving Multinomial Dist Prob w 10 Dice: 2 & 4 Occur 3x Each

  • Thread starter Thread starter dfraser
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the probability of rolling 10 dice where the faces 2 and 4 appear 3 times each. The proposed solution includes various combinations of how the remaining 4 dice can be filled, considering different scenarios for the remaining faces. The user is confused about the number of combinations for each scenario, which affects the final probability calculation. The correct answer is approximately 0.0178, indicating a discrepancy in the user's calculations. Clarification is needed on how to accurately determine the combinations for the remaining faces after selecting positions for the 2s and 4s.
dfraser
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm struggling with this problem:

Suppose we throw 10 standard dice. Find the probability that faces 2 and 4 occur 3 times each.

I think the solution should look something like this:
$$4*{10\choose3,3,4}(1/6)^3(1/6)^3(1/6)^4 + 4*{10\choose3,3,3,1}(1/6)^3(1/6)^3(1/6)^3(1/6)^1$$
$$+ 6*{10\choose3,3,2,2}(1/6)^3(1/6)^3(1/6)^2(1/6)^2 + {10\choose3,3,1,1,1,1}(1/6)^3(1/6)^3(1/6)^1(1/6)^1(1/6)^1(1/6)^1$$

In particular, I reason that there are four ways that we can use up the remaining 4 faces: (1) they can all be the same (2) three can be the same and one different (3) we can have two pairs, and (4) all the faces can be different.

(1) can happen in 4 ways, (2) can happen in 4 ways, (3) can happen in 6 ways, and (4) can happen in 1 way. Hence my solution.

However, I'm told that the correct answer corresponds to .0178, which differs from my solution. I think I might be getting confused about the number of combinations for each option; can anyone give me some pointers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Initially choose $3$ from $10$ positions for the $2$s.
Then choose from the remaining $7$ positions $3$ ones for the $4$s.
Fill the remaining $4$ positions with $1,3,5,6$.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top