Solving Muon Momentum Decay: Maximizing Expression & Intuition

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aleolomorfo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Particle
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the momentum decay of muons in the context of particle physics, specifically focusing on maximizing the expression for muon momentum as a function of angle. The original poster explores different approaches to derive this expression and questions the validity of their reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive an expression for muon momentum based on the conservation of momentum and energy, while also considering intuitive scenarios for maximum momentum. Some participants suggest solving the problem in the rest frame of the kaon before transforming to the lab frame.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some providing guidance on potential approaches. There are indications of multiple interpretations being explored, particularly regarding the setup and assumptions made in the calculations. The original poster seeks confirmation on the validity of their reasoning and assumptions.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific parameters and conditions from an attached file, which may contain additional constraints or information relevant to the problem setup. The discussion includes assumptions about the behavior of particles in different frames of reference.

Aleolomorfo
Messages
70
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Consider the decay ##K \rightarrow \mu + \nu##. Find the maximum ##\mu## momentum in a frame in which the ##K## momentum is 5 GeV
Relevant Equations
## P = (E, p_x, p_y, p_z)##
## P^2 = m^2##
My first idea was to find an expression of the muon momentum as a function of the angle and then maximaze the expression. But my attempts were not succesful. I report here my attempt.

Set up (referring to the attached file "bettini.pdf"):
$$ p = (\sqrt{p_k^2+m_k^2},0,0,p_k)$$
$$ k_1 = (\sqrt{p_{\mu}^2+m_{\mu}^2},0,p_{\mu}\sin{\theta}, p_{\mu}\cos{\theta})$$
$$ k_2 = (p_{\nu},0,-p_{\nu}\sin{\phi}, p_{\nu}\cos{\phi})$$

My attempt:

$$ p = k_1 + k_2 $$
$$ k_2 = p - k_1$$

Squaring

$$ k_2^2 = p^2 + k_1^2 -2pk_1$$
$$ 0 = m_k^2 + m_{\mu}^2 - 2\sqrt{(p_k^2+m_k^2)(p_{\mu}^2+m_{\mu}^2)} + 2p_kp_{\mu}\cos{\theta}$$

Continuing from here the computation to obtain ##p_{\mu}## as a function of ##\cos{\theta}## is quite demanding.

My second idea was to think intuitively that the case in which the muon momentum is maximum is when it flies forward and the neutrino backward. And in this particular case the computation is easier.

To sum up, my two questions are: Is there a way to perform my first idea? Is my second idea right?

Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
What I'd suggest is solving the problem in the rest frame of the kaon and then transforming back to the lab frame.
 
vela said:
What I'd suggest is solving the problem in the rest frame of the kaon and then transforming back to the lab frame.

I have attached the file with the set up.

$$ p = (m_k, 0, 0, 0)$$
$$ k_1 = (E_{\nu},0,0, E_{\nu})$$
$$ k_2 = (E_{\mu}, 0,0, -\sqrt{E_{\mu}^2-m_{\mu}^2})$$

Using the conservation of momentum and energy I get:

$$E_{\mu} = \frac{m_k^2+m_{\mu}^2}{2m_k} = 258.15 MeV $$
$$ p_{\mu} = \sqrt{E_{\mu}^2-m_{\mu}^2} = 235,53 MeV $$

Then I make the assumption that the muon has the maximum energy when it flies forward in the LAB frame:

$$\beta = \frac{p_k}{\sqrt{p_k^2+m_k^2}} = 1 $$
$$ \gamma = \frac{\sqrt{p_k^2+m_k^2}}{m_k} = 10$$

Using Lorentz transformation:

$$ p_{\mu}^{lab, max} = \gamma(p_{\mu}^{CM} + \beta E_{\mu}^{CM}) $$

Then substituting the numerical value I get the answer. Is it right?
 

Attachments

Looks good.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Aleolomorfo
vela said:
Looks good.

Thank you very much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K