Solving Navier-Stokes for Pressure in 1D

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on solving the Navier-Stokes equations in one dimension, specifically focusing on the pressure term and the implications of incompressibility. Participants explore theoretical aspects, potential solutions, and the conditions under which certain terms may be neglected.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the Navier-Stokes equation in 1D and seeks to find the pressure as a function of position and time.
  • Another participant questions the implications of setting the spatial derivative of velocity to zero, prompting a discussion on the necessity of additional information regarding time derivatives to solve for pressure.
  • A participant suggests that neglecting time-dependency simplifies the problem to Couette flow, indicating that the equation can be integrated to find a solution related to the pressure gradient.
  • Concerns are raised about the validity of the incompressibility assumption when it implies constant velocity, suggesting a need to apply this assumption in a broader context before reducing to 1D.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the concept of Navier-Stokes without pressure, emphasizing the importance of pressure in fluid motion and seeking interpretations of this scenario.
  • Another participant notes that when pressure is nearly constant, pressure gradients can be neglected, referencing Couette flow as an example.
  • A later contribution discusses the mathematical complexities introduced by pressure in the equations, mentioning non-locality and the challenges of treating time as a dynamical variable.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the treatment of pressure in the Navier-Stokes equations, with some suggesting that pressure can be neglected under certain conditions while others emphasize its necessity for fluid motion. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these assumptions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the assumptions made about incompressibility and the treatment of pressure gradients. The discussion also highlights the need for clarity on the conditions under which certain terms can be neglected.

stanley.st
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hello, I have Navier stokes in 1D

\rho\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}+u\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\right)=-\frac{\partial p}{\partial x}+\mu\frac{\partial^2u}{\partial x^2}

Condition of imcompressibility gives

\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}=0

So I have Navier stokes

\rho\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}=-\frac{\partial p}{\partial x}+\mu\frac{\partial^2u}{\partial x^2}

How to find pressure p(x,t)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To start, if \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = 0, then what is \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2} = \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\right)?

You still need some information about \frac{\partial u}{\partial t} to solve for p(x, t), however. What is the problem you're trying to solve?
 
Thank you so much. I have no specific problem to solve. I wanted to find general solution of NS in 1D. What is an example of such information?
 
if you also neglect the time-dependency, the problem reduces to that of Couette flow. The equation can be integrated twice to get a solution in terms of the unknown pressure gradient.

Also note, as hinted before, that you cannot use the incompressibility assumption like that because you now imply that the velocity is a constant (but time-varying). First use the incompressibility equation on the 2D or 3D equation, and then reduce to 1D.

If you keep the nonlinear term but neglect the pressure gradient, you get the Burgers equation, which is a much more interesting problem to study.
 
Thank you ! Navier-Stokes without pressure? It is strange, because in order to get particles move, we have to include pressure considerations. How would you interpret that ?
 
stanley.st said:
Thank you ! Navier-Stokes without pressure? It is strange, because in order to get particles move, we have to include pressure considerations. How would you interpret that ?

When the pressure is (nearly) constant, you can neglect the pressure gradients.
This is the case for (Couette) flow between two flat plates where one of the plates is moving and causing the flow motion.

The Burgers equation is mostly used to study shock waves.
 
The inclusion of pressure in the equation causes additional mathematical difficulties because pressure is non-local. Also, the derivation of the time dependent NS through variation assumes that time is stationary and in effect it is questionable whether it is present as a dynamical variable or a parameter. Moreover, since it describes fields it should display some form of gauge invariance which is still under investigation and its relationship with any form of Noether's theorem is at best weak.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K