Solving Notation & Convention Confusion in Differentials

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the notation and conventions used in differential equations, specifically in the context of the book "Differential Equations with Applications" by Ritger and Rose. The confusion arises from the distinction between the differential operator d/dx and the differential element dx. Participants clarify that the equation d(f(x,y)) = h(x,y)dx implies an integration with respect to x, leading to f(x,y) = g(x,y) + c, where g(x,y) = ∫h(x,y)dx. Furthermore, they emphasize that d(f(x,y)) = h(x,y)dx does not equate to (d/dx)(f(x,y)) = h(x,y) without additional context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations and their notation
  • Familiarity with integration techniques in calculus
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and their notation
  • Basic concepts of line integrals and the gradient theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the differences between total differentials and partial derivatives
  • Learn about the gradient theorem and its applications in multivariable calculus
  • Explore integration techniques for functions of multiple variables
  • Review the concepts of function of integration in differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals studying differential equations, mathematicians seeking clarity on notation, and educators teaching calculus and differential equations.

hideelo
Messages
88
Reaction score
15
I am currently reading "Differential Equatons with Applications" by Ritger and Rose, and I need some clarification about some notation and convention that they are using. I think it all stems from a lack of clarity of the difference between the operator d/dx and the "object" (I don't know what to call it, I don't really know what it is) dx

If I have an equation of the following form

d(f(x,y)) = h(x,y)dx

the approach they then take is to "integrate both sides" and they remain with the following equation

f(x,y) = g(x,y) + c where g(x,y) = ∫h(x,y)dx

the integration on the right is clearly with respect to x, I am not so clear as to what they are doing on the left however. It seems like they are asserting that the integral of the derivative of a function is the function itself. But with respect to what are they integrating it? Is this only with respect to x? If so then the answer is wrong since ∫ d(f(x,y))dx is in general not f(x,y) . Is this some sort of line integral and we are using gradient theorem? If so are we doing the same thing on the other side of the equation? I don't think so, as we are only integrating with respect to x

The other confusion comes from the following, if have the same initial equation as above, d(f(x,y)) = h(x,y)dx is that the same as (d/dx)(f(x,y)) = h(x,y)? If yes, how so? How about if I have something of the following form ∂/∂x (f(x,y)) = h(x,y)?

TIA
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hideelo said:
d(f(x,y)) = h(x,y)dx
I'm not sure that is meaningful in isolation. It certainly looks like it might mean ∂/∂x (f(x,y)) = h(x,y), but I can imagine other circumstances. E.g. we might be considering stepping a small distance along a path in the XY plane, so that in general d(f(x,y)) = h(x,y)dx+k(x,y).dy, but that it happens in this case that k(x,y) (at some point) is zero.
Assuming it does mean ∂/∂x (f(x,y)) = h(x,y), we can integrate wrt x to get f(x,y)=∫h(x,y).dx+k(y), where k is a 'function of integration', analogous to a constant of integration.
hideelo said:
∫ d(f(x,y))dx is in general not f(x,y)
∫ d(f(x,y))dx does not parse. You mean just ∫ d(f(x,y)).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K