Solving Puck in Mercury Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter eagles12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mercury
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a lead puck floating in a mercury bath, with specific dimensions provided. The task is to determine how deep the bottom of the puck is submerged in the mercury, given the densities of both materials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the volume of the submerged puck and the mass of the displaced mercury. There is uncertainty about how to calculate the volume of displaced mercury without knowing the dimensions of the mercury bath.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest that the densities of lead and mercury provide sufficient information to solve the problem, while others express confusion about the implications of the mercury bath's dimensions. The discussion is exploring the necessary conditions for the puck to float and the application of Archimedes' principle.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem does not require finding the absolute depth of the puck relative to the mercury bath's surface, but rather the depth of the puck below the mercury surface itself. There is acknowledgment that the rise in mercury level is not relevant to the solution.

eagles12
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A piece of lead has the shape of a hockey puck, with a diameter of 7.5 cm and a height of 2.9 cm. If the puck is placed in a mercury bath, it floats. How deep below the surface of the mercury is the bottom of the lead puck?

Homework Equations



ρhg=13534
plead=11340
vp/vt=pp/phg
v=∏r^2h

The Attempt at a Solution



I found the volume of the lead puck by plugging into the formula for the volume of a cyllinder, and got V=128.11
i looked up the denisty of lead which is 11340 and mercury, which is 13534 but I don't know the height or radius of the mercury bath so I am not sure how to proceed
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The puck will sink into the mercury until the mass of the mercury displaced (the volume of the mercury displaced is the volume of the submerged part of the puck- pi r^2 times the depth) is the same as the mass of the entire puck.
 
but i don't know anything about the mercury other than the density, so how do i find the volume of the displaced mercury
 
If you have the density of the mercury, and the density of the lead, you have everything you need to solve this. How much of the lead puck has to be under the surface to displace its mass in mercury?
 
eagles12 said:
[...] but I don't know the height or radius of the mercury bath so I am not sure how to proceed

One other thing that I thought I'd add: The problem statement is not asking you to find the absolute depth that the puck sinks (as in how far the puck sinks relative to its original position). For that you would need more information about the mercury bath.

Instead it asks, "How deep below the surface of the mercury is the bottom of the lead puck?"

Sure, the level of mercury will rise a little bit, but that's irrelevant for this problem. All you need to do is find the hypothetical puck-shaped piece of mercury that happens to have the same weight as the lead puck. The only difference in shape between the lead puck and the mercury shaped "puck" is the height.

Archimedes principle states "Any floating object displaces its own weight of fluid."
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
Replies
6
Views
2K