MHB Solving Q.7 with Truth Tables: What Is the Right Conclusion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ertagon2
  • Start date Start date
ertagon2
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hi so this is my homework
View attachment 7701
View attachment 7701
I had no problems solving q.6 using truth tables. (Please check if right)
But when solving q.7 i was faced with a question.
I got 2 matches in my truth table.
[table="width: 500, class: grid"]
[tr]
[td]A[/td]
[td]B[/td]
[td]C[/td]
[td]A...[/td]
[td]B...[/td]
[td]C...[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]T[/td]
[td]F[/td]
[td]T[/td]
[td]T[/td]
[td]F[/td]
[td]T[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]T[/td]
[td]T[/td]
[td]F[/td]
[td]T[/td]
[td]T[/td]
[td]F[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]

I was told by my professor that for answer to be right the right side must give the same result as left.
But now I have two matches (left side=right side) what conclusion do i draw from this ?
 

Attachments

  • mathshomework1.png
    mathshomework1.png
    11.8 KB · Views: 136
Physics news on Phys.org
ertagon2 said:
Hi so this is my homeworkI had no problems solving q.6 using truth tables. (Please check if right)
But when solving q.7 i was faced with a question.
I got 2 matches in my truth table.
[TABLE="class: grid, width: 500"]
[TR]
[TD]A[/TD]
[TD]B[/TD]
[TD]C[/TD]
[TD]A...[/TD]
[TD]B...[/TD]
[TD]C...[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]T[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]T[/TD]
[TD]T[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]T[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]T[/TD]
[TD]T[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]T[/TD]
[TD]T[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

I was told by my professor that for answer to be right the right side must give the same result as left.
But now I have two matches (left side=right side) what conclusion do i draw from this ?
Hi ertagon2,

Your answer to Q6 is correct.

For Q7, I understand that you copied the two rows corresponding to the two matches; if this is the case, they are correct.

What this means is that there are two solutions to the question of who is a knight and who is a knave.

However, that is not the question you are asked. The first question is about the statement "exactly one of B and C is a knave but you can't tell which".

Note that, in each of the two solutions, it is true that exactly one of B and C is a knave: the first part of the statement is true. Furthermore, as there are two possible solutions (B or C is the knave), it is also true that you can't tell which, and that is the second part of the statement. The answer to the question is therefore "true".

For the second question, note that, in each of the two solutions, A is a knight. The answer is therefore also "true" in this case.
 
castor28 said:
Hi ertagon2,

Your answer to Q6 is correct.

For Q7, I understand that you copied the two rows corresponding to the two matches; if this is the case, they are correct.

What this means is that there are two solutions to the question of who is a knight and who is a knave.

However, that is not the question you are asked. The first question is about the statement "exactly one of B and C is a knave but you can't tell which".

Note that, in each of the two solutions, it is true that exactly one of B and C is a knave: the first part of the statement is true. Furthermore, as there are two possible solutions (B or C is the knave), it is also true that you can't tell which, and that is the second part of the statement. The answer to the question is therefore "true".

For the second question, note that, in each of the two solutions, A is a knight. The answer is therefore also "true" in this case.

Thanks. I just wanted to make sure that my undertstanding is right.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Back
Top