Solving Solar Neutrino Problem with Planck Scale Foams

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutrino Solar
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The solar neutrino problem has evolved, with recent confirmations of neutrino oscillations by the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO) indicating that the deficit in detected neutrinos is due to oscillation phenomena rather than flaws in solar models. The April 2004 paper linking Planck scale foams to this issue suggests a theoretical framework, but ongoing research continues to explore the complexities of neutrino behavior. The consensus is that while the solar neutrino problem is reframed as a neutrino problem, it remains an active area of investigation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of neutrino oscillations
  • Familiarity with solar neutrino detection methods
  • Knowledge of quantum gravity concepts, specifically Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG)
  • Basic grasp of the Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata matrix
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of neutrino oscillations on particle physics
  • Study the Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata matrix in detail
  • Explore the role of the Higgs boson in neutrino mass generation
  • Investigate current experiments related to neutrino factories
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in particle physics, and anyone interested in the complexities of neutrino behavior and quantum gravity theories.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
551
can anyone tell me if the, "solar neutrino problem", has been
solved, i ask because, i found a April 2004 paper that "solves"
the problem by linking to Planck scale foams aka LQG.
the thread is "quantum gravity Planck scales" in S and GR.

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0404014
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know if it fully solved the problem, but the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO) confirmed neutrino oscillations in the last couple of years.
 
There is very strong evidence these days that neutrinos oscillate. I wouldn't go so far as to say it's a closed case, however.

- Warren
 
There is still a lot of ongoing research into neutrino oscillations, the so called "neutrino factory". The solar neutrino problem is far from solved.
 
wolram said:
can anyone tell me if the, "solar neutrino problem", has been
solved, i ask because, i found a April 2004 paper that "solves"
the problem by linking to Planck scale foams aka LQG.
the thread is "quantum gravity Planck scales" in S and GR.

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0404014

http://www.nature.com/nsu/030120/030120-4.html

http://www.nature.com/nsu/010621/010621-5.html

Zz.
 
thankyou all, i can see that the therory in the paper i pointed to
may be worthy of consideration.
 
If by 'solar neutrino problem' you mean 'why do the classic solar neutrino detectors find only ~65% of the neutrinos predicted from solar models?', then the problem has been solved, in the sense that the solar models have been found to be sound, and the 'deficit' of neutrinos laid at the door of neutrino oscillations. In this sense, it's no longer a 'solar' neutrino problem, rather a 'neutrino' problem.
 
Nereid said:
If by 'solar neutrino problem' you mean 'why do the classic solar neutrino detectors find only ~65% of the neutrinos predicted from solar models?', then the problem has been solved, in the sense that the solar models have been found to be sound, and the 'deficit' of neutrinos laid at the door of neutrino oscillations. In this sense, it's no longer a 'solar' neutrino problem, rather a 'neutrino' problem.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
i understand better now, the neutrino is a schizophrenic particle
that can change character every few hundred miles. but what
causes these changes?
 
Excellent question!

In one way, the answer is very simple: at least one flavour has non-zero mass. However, this just pushes the question back - why does it have non-zero mass (or, why don't the other flavours also have non-zero mass)? Also, what is that mass? And, will the Higgs help us understand neutrinos better? Do we need a SUSY theory??
 
  • #10
I once read an article of Baez that said that the key was in a matrix called the Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata matrix. I even remember that he described that matrix like "misterious"
 
  • #11
Why don't muon neutrinos oscillate with electron neutrinos?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K