Solving System of First-Order ODEs: Exact Solution for x(t)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a system of first-order ordinary differential equations (ODEs) given by x' = y * (a1*x + a2*y + c1) and y' = y * (a3*x + a4*y + c2). Participants explore methods for finding the exact solution for x(t) and discuss the complexities involved in the solution process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests examining the quotient of y' and x' to find relationships between the variables.
  • Another participant questions whether y must be a function of x, raising examples where this may not hold.
  • There is a mention of the potential to transform the system into an exact ODE, which some participants consider as a viable approach.
  • One participant notes that nontrivial solutions cannot be expressed in terms of elementary functions, referencing the Lambert W function.
  • Another participant expresses interest in analyzing the system's behavior through phase portraits, indicating a preference for qualitative analysis over exact solutions.
  • One participant shares that they have obtained numerical solutions using MATLAB but seeks further understanding of the properties of x or its integral.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of finding exact solutions, with some suggesting that it may not be possible while others explore various methods. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact solution for x(t) and the best approach to analyze the system.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the relationships between x and y, as well as the dependence on specific values of constants in the equations. The discussion also highlights the complexity of the system and the challenges in deriving solutions.

googler
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I have been trying to solve the following system of first-order ordinary differential equations for a week:
x' = y * (a1*x + a2*y + c1),
y' = y * (a3*x + a4*y + c2),
where x and y are functions of t, and ai and ci are constants. This system seems not very complex, but I have not found the its exact solutions.

Can anyone tell me the exact solution for x(t)? Many thanks!Kenneth
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume you mean a4 in the 2nd equation, can't you just look at the quotient of the two?
 
Hi 'NoMoreExams', thank you very much. The typo has been corrected.

Could you tell me how you solve this problem by making use of the quotient? Many thanks for your patience and time.
 
Well what does y'/x' look like? Note that you are dropping a solution.
 
I tried this way... y'/x' = (a3*x + a4*y + c2)/(a1*x + a2*y + c1), and we could find some relationship between x*y', y^2, x'*y, x^2, x', and y'. But what follows? Sorry, I am confused.
 
No... if y' = dy/dt and x' = dx/dt then y'/x' = ?
 
That's cool. But does that mean y MUST BE A FUNCTION of x? Originally this does not necessarily hold. (For example, can we use this method if x = sin(t) and y = t^2?)
 
... why doesn't it work in that case? x = sin(sqrt(y)) or x = sin(-sqrt(y))
 
You are very smart :)
I am not sure if I am right now, because it becomes more and more complicated as I continue this procedure... Could you tell me the result, if it is simple to you? Thanks once again.
 
  • #10
Well it looks like it can be made into an exact ODE so I'd go that route probably
 
  • #11
You should also try to go about this in a different way, for your own education. Find the fixed points, figure out their stability and try to draw the phase portrait yourself.
 
  • #12
Hi Kenneth,

googler said:
Dear all,

I have been trying to solve the following system of first-order ordinary differential equations for a week:
x' = y * (a1*x + a2*y + c1),
y' = y * (a3*x + a4*y + c2),
where x and y are functions of t, and ai and ci are constants. This system seems not very complex, but I have not found the its exact solutions.

Can anyone tell me the exact solution for x(t)?
For the system of ODEs as you have them in full generality, one cannot hope to write the nontrivial solutions in terms of elementary functions (a computer package-generated solution involving the Lambert W function et al instructs me as much). Investigating the behaviour of solutions by way of phase portraits, as NoMoreExams suggested, would seem more appropriate. Indeed, performing this kind of analysis for various values of the constants hints at the impossibility of constructing an exact solution.
 
  • #13
Hi Unco and 'NoMoreExams',

Thank you very much for your help. Actually I am just interested in the case where c2 = -c3. I have obtained the numerical solution using MATLAB but it is not enough since I need to find the property of all possible x or \int x dt. Now I am trying the way of phase portraits :)
 
  • #14
Hi Unco,

Could you please tell me what package you used to generate the solution involving the Lambert W function (and the solution you found)? It is OK that the solution could not be written in terms of elementary function. I just need to analyze the behavior of the solution.

Many thanks!

Unco said:
Hi Kenneth,


For the system of ODEs as you have them in full generality, one cannot hope to write the nontrivial solutions in terms of elementary functions (a computer package-generated solution involving the Lambert W function et al instructs me as much). Investigating the behaviour of solutions by way of phase portraits, as NoMoreExams suggested, would seem more appropriate. Indeed, performing this kind of analysis for various values of the constants hints at the impossibility of constructing an exact solution.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K