Solving Tensions & Weights Homework Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter jegues
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving tensions and weights, specifically focusing on a system of cables and forces in equilibrium. Participants are attempting to derive equations based on the forces acting on the system, using trigonometric relationships to express the tensions in the cables.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss generating equations from the equilibrium of forces in both the x and y directions. There is a focus on identifying the correct number of equations needed to solve for multiple unknowns, with some questioning the approach of ignoring certain sections of the system.

Discussion Status

Several equations have been proposed, and participants are actively engaging in clarifying their understanding of the relationships between the tensions. There is recognition of the complexity involved in solving the system, with some participants expressing uncertainty about the number of unknowns and the equations required.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of working with four unknowns and the potential for sign errors when using trigonometric functions. There is also mention of the need for clarity on when to use sine or cosine based on the angles involved in the problem.

jegues
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


See figure.


Homework Equations


[tex]\sum F = ma[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution


By just looking at the picture I was able to generate 2 equations but I seem to have 3 unknowns so I'm sort of stuck right now. Here are my equations:

[tex]50 = T_{ba}sin(130) + T_{bc}sin(\alpha)[/tex] and,

[tex]40 + T_{bc}sin(180+\alpha) = T_{cd}sin(50)[/tex]

Any ideas of anything I'm missing? Am I taking the correct approach to this problem? Is there a simplier way!?

Thanks,
 

Attachments

  • WeightQ.JPG
    WeightQ.JPG
    10.3 KB · Views: 399
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi jegues! :smile:

hmm … two vertical equations :rolleyes:

now i wonder where you could get a third equation from? :wink:
 
I think I may have figured out how to generate the extra equations I need.

I know the the rings where all the cables are attached are in equilibrium in the x and y directions.

If I apply [tex]\sum F_{x} = 0[/tex] I should be able to generate enough equations to solve this problem.

Is this the correct approach?

EDIT: [tex]T_{bc}cos(\alpha) + T_{ba}cos(130) = 0[/tex]
 
jegues said:
EDIT: [tex]T_{bc}cos(\alpha) + T_{ba}cos(130) = 0[/tex]

That's it! :smile:

(though it might be easier in this case to use Tba and Tcd instead. :wink:)
 
though it might be easier in this case to use Tba and Tcd instead.

So we just "ignore" the section in the middle? (BC) It is all in equilibrium so it shouldn't affect our answers anyways correct?

So,

[tex]T_{ba}cos(130) = T_{cd}cos(50)[/tex],

Correct?
 
jegues said:
So we just "ignore" the section in the middle? (BC) It is all in equilibrium so it shouldn't affect our answers anyways correct?

So,

[tex]T_{ba}cos(130) = T_{cd}cos(50)[/tex],

Correct?

That's right! :smile:

(except for the sign … why do you persist in using angles > 90º ? …

you can make mistakes doing that! :wink:)
 
I run into sign errors whenever I've done it any other way. I think our professor showed us a way to correct it either using sin or cos for the given angle but I've always found it easier to simply use cosines for the x components and sines for the y component.

I'm a little lost at the best way to solve the 3 equation 3 variable system, it's always easier when I don't have to solve for an angle... ( [tex]\alpha[/tex] in this case)

Any more tips!?
 
I'm left with the following three equations:

(1) : [tex]T_{ba}sin(130) + T_{bc}sin(\alpha) = 50[/tex]

(2) : [tex]T_{bc}sin(180+\alpha)-T_{cd}sin(50) = -40[/tex]

(3) : [tex]T_{ba}cos(130) - T_{cd}cos(50) = 0[/tex]

I'm getting a headache trying to solve them :s

EDIT: Doh! I just reliazed I had 4 unknowns. I'm going to need another equation aren't I?
 
So solving for 4 unknowns,

(1) : [tex]T_{ba}sin(130) + T_{bc}sin(\alpha) = 50[/tex]

(2) : [tex]T_{bc}sin(180+\alpha)-T_{cd}sin(50) = -40[/tex]

(3) : [tex]T_{ba}cos(130) - T_{cd}cos(50) = 0[/tex]

(4) : [tex]T_{bc}cos(\alpha) + T_{ba}cos(130) = 0[/tex]

EDIT: Is this really what I'm stuck with doing? This is going to be an algebraic nightmare...
 
  • #10
jegues said:
I've always found it easier to simply use cosines for the x components and sines for the y component.

eek! sorry, but I'm with your professor on this …

don't be so inflexible, choose cos or sin to be appropriate for the diagram, not to make you feel at home!
I'm a little lost at the best way to solve the 3 equation 3 variable system, it's always easier when I don't have to solve for an angle... ( [tex]\alpha[/tex] in this case)

hmm … I've just noticed you have four unknowns, not three …

looks like you're going to need that Tbc and Tba equation anyway.

Tips? No, just use common-sense, and keep going. :smile:

EDIT: if you used 50 instead of 130, it wouldn't look so intimidating. And sin(180º + α) = -sinα.
 
  • #11
choose cos or sin to be appropriate for the diagram

How is this done? He went over it really fast in class so I couldn't really understand how he was determining to either place a cos or a sin for the given angle.

Thank again, and am I actually stuck with that algebraic nightmare!?
 
  • #12
jegues said:
How is this done? He went over it really fast in class so I couldn't really understand how he was determining to either place a cos or a sin for the given angle.

It's always cos of the angle between the force and the direction.

It's never sin (except, of course, that sometimes the angle marked in the diagram is the "wrong" angle … so if they tell you that the angle to the horizontal is α, but you need cos of the angle to the vertical, then since it's always cos, that means it's cos(90º - α), which is sinα :wink:)
 
  • #13
instead of making things complicated using T[c] why don't u just name them T1.T2,T3? easier that way so u don't confuse them
 
  • #14
So if I'm looking at angles based from the horizontal axis I use cos(a) and if its from the vertical sin(a)? How do you know which sign to assign to these?

Also,

Thank again, and am I actually stuck with that algebraic nightmare!?
?
 
  • #15
maybe instead of the horizon u should use a bearing instead?
 
  • #16
Still wondering if I'm actually stuck with solving a system of 4 equations and 4 unknowns... ?
 
  • #17
(just got up :zzz: …)
jegues said:
So if I'm looking at angles based from the horizontal axis I use cos(a) and if its from the vertical sin(a)? How do you know which sign to assign to these?

If the force is in (approximately) the same direction as the positive axis, then it's +, if it's the other way, its -.

And I repeat, always use cos.
jegues said:
Still wondering if I'm actually stuck with solving a system of 4 equations and 4 unknowns... ?

Well, for a start, it's only 3, because you immediately know that Tab = Tcd.

Get on with it! :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K