MHB Solving the Lawn Mowing Puzzle: Explained!

  • Thread starter Thread starter amirus15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Puzzle
amirus15
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
So person A takes 1 less hour than person B to mow a lawn, Person C takes twice as long as Person B to mow a lawn. All together they mow a lawn in one hour. How long does it take each of them to mow a lawn working alone? Can someone explain this to me please, thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi and welcome to the forum.

Let the productivity of A, B, C, measured in lawns per hour, be $a$, $b$ and $c$, respectively. Then A mows the lawn in $1/a$ hours, B does it in $1/b$ hours and C takes $1/c$ hours. Their combined productivity is $a+b+c$, and by assumption $1/(a+b+c)=1$, i.e.,
\[
a+b+c=1.\qquad(*)
\]
Now write the conditions
  1. Person A takes 1 less hour than person B to mow a lawn.
  2. Person C takes twice as long as Person B to mow a lawn
in terms of $a$, $b$ and $c$ and express $a$ and $c$ through $b$. Substituting these expressions into (*) will give you one equation in $b$. It has two solutions, but only one of them has physical sense.
 
Equivalently: let t be the time, in hours, it takes person B to mow the lawn.
so B has rate 1/t "lawns per hour".

person A takes 1 less hour than person B to mow a lawn
So A's time is t- 1 and rate is 1/(t- 1)

Person C takes twice as long as Person B to mow a lawn
So C's time is 2t and rate is 1/(2t)

All together they mow a lawn in one hour.
This last sentence tells us that, together, their rate of work is "1 hour per job".
When people, machines, etc. "work together", their rates of work add.
1/t+ 1/(t-1)+ 1/2t= 1. Solve that for t, the time It takes B to mow a lawn then find the times for A and B.

(Multiplying both sides of the equation by 2t(t-1) will eliminate the fractions.)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top