Solving the Puzzle: Forces & Acceleration

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
22 replies · 4K views
jamesdubya
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I had just asked a question about boats going across a river but that question and this question really have me stumped.

Homework Statement


http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/7910/68512243.png
A)Find the acceleration using Newtons laws
B)Find the velocity using Conservation of Total Mechanical Energy.

Homework Equations


Idisk=1/2mR^2 (what is R?)
M1=T+Ff-MG=ma
M2=1/2mR^2-t+t=ma
M3=-T-Mg=ma
I doubt these are right but I tried, I'm terrible at summing forces.


The Attempt at a Solution


A)FnMuk-1.1(9.8)+1/2mR^2-t+t-t-Mg=m(a)
I know I am way off but just so you can see I at least tried.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Radius of the disc R is required to find the acceleration.
The tensions in the two sections of the string are not equal.
So rewrite the equations for M1, M2 and M3.
 
m1=T-MG-Fn-FF ?
m2= ?? My only guess would be the previous equation.
m3=T+MGH
 
jamesdubya said:
m1=T-MG-Fn-FF ?
m2= ?? My only guess would be the previous equation.
m3=T+MGH

No, you're ignoring what rl.bhat :smile: said …

there are two tensions, so call them T1 and T2.

(yes, I know the tension along a string is usually constant, but that's only if the pulley is frictionless … in this case, there is friction at the pulley, otherwise it wouldn't turn, so the tension is different on either side.)
 
ohh ok i see i see, thank you for your response... so
M1=Muk*M+T1
M2=M*.5mr^2+T1-T2
M3=T2-mg
any better?
 
jamesdubya said:
ohh ok i see i see, thank you for your response... so
M1=Muk*M+T1
M2=M*.5mr^2+T1-T2
M3=T2-mg
any better?

(have a mu: µ and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)

You're not writing these properly.

The first and third equations are F = ma.

The second equation is torque = Iα.

Start again (and be careful about the ±s). :smile:
 
M1=[tex]\mu[/tex]*M-T1=ma
M2=I[tex]\beta[/tex]
M3=-T2+MG=ma
any better?
 
jamesdubya said:
M1=[tex]\mu[/tex]*M-T1=ma
M2=I[tex]\beta[/tex]
M3=-T2+MG=ma
any better?

(what happened to that µ i gave you? :confused:)

The third equation is correct.

In the first equation, the signs are wrong.

The second equation isn't an equation (and what is ß anyway?)
 
I tried to use it! it came out goofy looking.. By the big B i ment to put[tex]\alpha[/tex].
M1=-µ*M+T1=ma
M2= I [tex]\alpha[/tex]= M2G+T2
M3=-T2+MG=ma
what about now?
 
jamesdubya said:
By the big B i ment to put[tex]\alpha[/tex].

:smile: :smile:
M1=-µ*M+T1=ma
M2= I [tex]\alpha[/tex]= M2G+T2
M3=-T2+MG=ma
what about now?

The first equation is fine now (and easy to read :wink:), except you need a g (why are you writing "G"?)

In the second equation, why do you have an Mg … that pulley isn't going anywhere, is it? Also, you need to change α into a function of a, you need to use T1, and you need torque on the RHS, not force.
 
ok so then
M2=M2+T1=I[tex]\alpha[/tex]
I don't really understand what you mean change a to a function of a sorry. Does this look at least a little better
 
jamesdubya said:
ok so then
M2=M2+T1=I[tex]\alpha[/tex]
I don't really understand what you mean change a to a function of a sorry. Does this look at least a little better

grrr … not much.

What is M2 doing there?

What happened to T2?

And, I repeat, T is a force, you need a torque

(and you need a in all three equations, or you won't be able to solve them :redface:, so you must write α in terms of a)
 
m2 is just a pulley it is just letting the rope go through it pretty much. So add a -T2 and set it = r x F which is =r x ma ?
 
jamesdubya said:
m2 is just a pulley it is just letting the rope go through it pretty much. So add a -T2 and set it = r x F which is =r x ma ?

I think you need to get some sleep. :zzz:

Start again in the morning. :smile:
 
I fell asleep at 6 and woke up super early, I am up for the day.Can you please just help me with this I just am not understanding how to do torque..
 
jamesdubya said:
I fell asleep at 6 and woke up super early, I am up for the day.Can you please just help me with this I just am not understanding how to do torque..

Does that mean you've only had about 2 hours sleep?

You've been making silly mistakes for the last three posts. If you're not normally like this, then you need more sleep.

torque is force times (perpendicular) distance, in this case tension times radius. :smile:
 
no i had about 8 slept from 6-230ish...anyway...I just don't understand it, they may be silly to you but this makes 0 sense to me, that's why I came here, I wouldn't be here if i knew how to do it well.. I do appreciate your attempts at help though.. ok so then M2=t2*radius ?
 
a\R=[tex]\alpha[/tex]?
 
M1=-µ*Mg+T1=ma
m2 = T2*radius - T1*radius=Iα
M3=-T2+Mg=ma

µ*M1g+T1-T2+M3g=ma
.36*1.1*9.81+5*9.81=1.6(a)
33.08=a
is that right?
I don't know how to find the radius for the disk
 
jamesdubya said:
µ*M1g+T1-T2+M3g=ma
.36*1.1*9.81+5*9.81=1.6(a)
33.08=a
is that right?

Is M3 5 kg or 0.5 kg? :confused:

And you left out a minus.
I don't know how to find the radius for the disk

You don't need it, it cancels. :smile:

You need to eliminate T1 and T2 (because you don't know them, and the question doesn't ask for them), so get two equations for T1 - T2.​
 
It's 5kg.
t1-t2=Iα
and then I had a t1-t2 in my other equation that would cancel these out.