MHB Solving the Wave Equation: Finding $u(x,t)$

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

Let $$u_{tt}-c^2 u_{xx}=0, x \in \mathbb{R}, t>0 \\ u(x,0)=0, u_t(x,0)=g(x)$$
where $g \in C^1(\mathbb{R})$ with $g(x)>0$ for $x \in (0,1)$, $g(x)=0$ for $x \geq 1$ and $g(x)=-g(-x)$ for $x \leq 0$. I want to find the sets of $\{ (x,t): x \in \mathbb{R}, t \geq 0 \}$ where $u=0, u<0$ and $u>0$.

I have thought the following.

We have that $u(x,t)=\frac{\phi(x+ct)+ \phi(x-ct)}{2}+ \frac{1}{2c} \int_{x-ct}^{x+ct} \psi(\zeta) d{\zeta}$

where $u(x,0)=\phi(x)$ and $u_t(x,0)=\psi(x)$.

So in our case, $\phi(x)=0$ and $\psi(x)=g(x)$.

So we have that $u(x,t)= \frac{1}{2c} \int_{x-ct}^{x+ct} \psi(\zeta) d{\zeta}$.

We have that $u>0$ when $x-ct \in (0,1)$ and $x+ ct \in (0,+\infty)$, $u=0$ when ( $x+ct \geq 1$ and $x-ct \geq 1)$ or $(x+ct \leq -1$ and $x-ct \leq -1)$ , and $u<0$ when $x+ct \in (-1,0)$ and $x-ct \in (-\infty,0)$ .Am I right? (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey evinda! (Smile)

It looks correct to me.
 
I like Serena said:
Hey evinda! (Smile)

It looks correct to me.

Great... Thank you! (Smirk)
 
There is the following linear Volterra equation of the second kind $$ y(x)+\int_{0}^{x} K(x-s) y(s)\,{\rm d}s = 1 $$ with kernel $$ K(x-s) = 1 - 4 \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \dfrac{1}{\lambda_n^2} e^{-\beta \lambda_n^2 (x-s)} $$ where $y(0)=1$, $\beta>0$ and $\lambda_n$ is the $n$-th positive root of the equation $J_0(x)=0$ (here $n$ is a natural number that numbers these positive roots in the order of increasing their values), $J_0(x)$ is the Bessel function of the first kind of zero order. I...
Are there any good visualization tutorials, written or video, that show graphically how separation of variables works? I particularly have the time-independent Schrodinger Equation in mind. There are hundreds of demonstrations out there which essentially distill to copies of one another. However I am trying to visualize in my mind how this process looks graphically - for example plotting t on one axis and x on the other for f(x,t). I have seen other good visual representations of...
Back
Top