Solving Wave Speed of a Violin String

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the wave speed of a violin string with a mass of 0.35g and a length of 33 cm, vibrating at a frequency of 196 Hz. The correct wave speed is determined using the first harmonic, yielding a speed of 129.36 m/s. Alternative calculations using the second harmonic resulted in an incorrect wave speed of 64.68 m/s. The necessity of assuming a specific harmonic when solving such problems is emphasized, particularly when the frequency is provided.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave mechanics and harmonics
  • Familiarity with the wave speed formula: v = f * λ
  • Knowledge of fundamental frequency and harmonics in string instruments
  • Basic principles of tension and linear density in strings
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of harmonics in stringed instruments
  • Learn about the relationship between tension, mass, and wave speed in strings
  • Explore the calculation of linear density in vibrating strings
  • Investigate the effects of different frequencies on wave speed in various mediums
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on wave mechanics, music acoustics, and string instruments. This discussion is also beneficial for educators teaching concepts related to harmonics and wave speed calculations.

HHH
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A violin string with a mass of 0.35g is 33 cm long. The frequency of a wave supported by the string is 196 Hz.

What is the speed of the wave?

Homework Equations


Ln = n/2 *lambda
v = f*lambda

The Attempt at a Solution



1. Solve for wave length [/B]
L1 = 1/2 *lambda
0.33 = 1/2 * lambda
0.33 *2 = lambda
0.66 = lambda

2. Solve for speed of wave
v = f * lambda
v = 196 * 0.66
v = 129.36 m/s

I just assumed you have to use first harmonic and got the right answer, but why do we have to use first harmonic? or is there another way to do it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
HHH said:
is there another way to do it?
You mean, without assuming 1st harmonic?
What if you assume 2nd harmonic? Does that give a different answer?
 
haruspex said:
You mean, without assuming 1st harmonic?
What if you assume 2nd harmonic? Does that give a different answer?

1. Solve for wave length
L1 = 2/2 *lambda
0.33 = 2/2 * lambda
0.33 *1 = lambda
0.33 = lambda

2. Solve for speed of wave
v = f * lambda
v = 196 * 0.33
v = 64.68 m/s

I get that which is wrong
 
HHH said:
1. Solve for wave length
L1 = 2/2 *lambda
0.33 = 2/2 * lambda
0.33 *1 = lambda
0.33 = lambda

2. Solve for speed of wave
v = f * lambda
v = 196 * 0.33
v = 64.68 m/s

I get that which is wrong
Quite so. So it follows that it is necessary to assume a particular harmonic, right?
 
haruspex said:
Quite so. So it follows that it is necessary to assume a particular harmonic, right?
So is it just a poorly worded question. Or do you always use first harmonic if it doesn't say.

Also, In the question, it does however mention that the string supports 196Hz, so is that a minimum frequency→like a harmonic?
 
HHH said:
it does however mention that the string supports 196Hz, so is that a minimum frequency→like a harmonic?
No, I think that just means it is one of the frequencies at which it can vibrate.
I note that it does give you the mass of the string, but that's no use without knowing the tension. Is there a later part to the question that asks you to find the tension?
 
haruspex said:
No, I think that just means it is one of the frequencies at which it can vibrate.
I note that it does give you the mass of the string, but that's no use without knowing the tension. Is there a later part to the question that asks you to find the tension?
B) What is the linear density of the string?
C) What is the tension in the string?

Those are easy if you know the speed.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
960