Can you provide some specific examples? Without these, we won’t know what it is that you see us doing wrong.Z0dCHiY8 said:Because they have used their admin resource to substitute the lack of arguments...
I take it you object to anyone pointing out that you are wrong. That's not going to work well on this forum. It's nothing personal, it's just that incorrect statements are not going to fly.Z0dCHiY8 said:https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/principles-behind-a-ball-pitching-machine.977144/this one, for example.
Moderating and Contributing in a discussion are not guaranteed to be a conflict.Z0dCHiY8 said:Actually, it's good standard, if moderators don't involve into discussion. Because they have used their admin resource to substitute the lack of arguments. If PF will not address this issue, it will slide into small community w/ small (to zero) donations as well. my Best Regards.
Your failure to understand the argument is not the same as a lack of argument. Do you know why spin is so important in baseball pitches? If so, then why did you propose so many methods that do not provide spin?Z0dCHiY8 said:Because they have used their admin resource to substitute the lack of arguments.
Z0dCHiY8 said:If PF will not address this issue, it will slide into small community w/ small (to zero) donations as well.
just one wheel ain't provide very much for spin..Dale said:Your failure to understand the argument is not the same as a lack of argument. Do you know why spin is so important in baseball pitches? If so, then why did you propose so many methods that do not provide spin?
unfortunately, the're no guaranty for fair discussion.symbolipoint said:Moderating and Contributing in a discussion are not guaranteed to be a conflict.
The topic isn't killed, just your participation. As a moderator who was not involved in the discussion I can tell you that I have no disagreement with my colleague in his actions there. Although you appear to be aware of the issue of spin now, you gave no indication of that in the thread and you did not engage with the other participants on that issue. You seemed more interested in simply hijacking the thread than in responding to the substantive issues brought up by others or in specifically addressing the OP's question.Z0dCHiY8 said:i clearly understand it's highly disputable topic, but just kill it like that
actually, i hadn't been having a chance to explain my point, just was blocked from that thread :) and, actually, discussion went too South on 4th post.. OP just asked..Dale said:Although you appear to be aware of the issue of spin now, you gave no indication of that in the thread and you did not engage with the other participants on that issue.
3rd post (from me) just pinpointed..The wheel itself is quite large (30cm), and makes for a relatively immobile machine. I was wondering whether I could reduce the size of this wheel and was wondering how this would affect the performance.
learn www.google.ru/search?q=angular+speed Another way is to make pneumatic gun.
i was saying it about another topic..Dale said:The topic isn't killed, just your participation.
Nonsense. In fact you had four chances. In none of which you addressed the actual question from the OP.Z0dCHiY8 said:i hadn't been having a chance to explain my point, just was blocked from that thread
unfortunately, technical details's been related to "feedback & moderation".. anyway, I'm done == Internet has a lot of space. my Best Regards :)Dale said:This sub forum is for discussion of feedback and moderation. Technical discussions are off topic here
Z0dCHiY8 said:i was saying it about another topic..
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/what-about-bombing-versus-wildfires.976758/
Dale said:Nonsense. In fact you had four chances. In none of which you addressed the actual question from the OP.
To all participants: This sub forum is for discussion of feedback and moderation. Technical discussions are off topic here. Further technical discussions here will be deleted.
If the originating topic is still open, maybe resUme orderly comments and questions THERE, and not here.Z0dCHiY8 said:unfortunately, technical details's been related to "feedback & moderation".. anyway, I'm done == Internet has a lot of space. my Best Regards :)
funny part == I've been still blocked out there :)symbolipoint said:If the originating topic is still open, maybe resUme orderly comments and questions THERE, and not here.
Moderation refers to the act of keeping something within reasonable limits or avoiding extremes. In the context of behavior or communication, it involves using self-control and making thoughtful decisions.
Moderation is important because it helps maintain balance and harmony in various aspects of life. It can prevent excessive or harmful behaviors, promote healthy habits, and improve relationships with others.
Practicing moderation involves being aware of one's actions and making intentional choices. This can include setting limits, avoiding overindulgence, and finding a healthy balance between different aspects of life.
The benefits of moderation include improved physical and mental health, better decision-making, and stronger relationships. It can also lead to a more fulfilling and enjoyable life by avoiding burnout and excess stress.
While moderation is generally beneficial, it is possible to take it to an extreme and become too restrictive or self-critical. It's important to find a balance and not let moderation become an obsession or source of anxiety.