Something like category theory but for physics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the search for a unified framework in physics akin to the role of category theory in mathematics, as highlighted in R. Geroch's book, "Mathematical Physics." Participants suggest that classical field theory serves as a general framework encompassing classical mechanics, electromagnetism, and thermodynamics. They note the potential of viewing all physical theories as probability theories, although resources for this topic are scarce. The article "Quantum Probability Theory" by Redei and Summers is mentioned as a relevant resource, alongside two recommended books from Springer.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of category theory and its applications in mathematics
  • Familiarity with classical field theory concepts
  • Basic knowledge of probability theory and von Neumann algebras
  • Experience with mathematical structures such as lattices and algebras
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the article "Quantum Probability Theory" by Redei and Summers for insights into probability theories
  • Explore the book "Mathematical Physics" by R. Geroch for its treatment of category theory
  • Investigate the two recommended Springer books on mathematical physics frameworks
  • Study the implications of non-commutative von Neumann algebras in classical theories
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and researchers interested in the unification of physical theories through advanced mathematical frameworks, particularly those exploring the intersection of probability theory and physics.

Geofleur
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
426
Reaction score
177
I was impressed how in R. Geroch's book, Mathematical Physics, category theory is used to unify so many different branches of mathematics. Is there a single framework that, in a similar way, unifies many or all branches of physics? If so, what are some good resources for learning it?

So far, the closest I have seen is perhaps the mathematics of linearity, of multi-linear maps and objects on which such maps act. Is there something better? It would be great to be able to see each area of physics as instantiating some one thing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Classical field theory is one very general framework: classical mechanics, E&M, and thermodynamics can all be treated this way.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Geofleur
Is there a good book that presents it in this way?
 
I think the most general framework is the one that views all theories of physics (including the classical ones) as probability theories. This topic is unfortunately extremely difficult. I don't think there's a good book on the topic, at least not at a level that can be understood by someone below the level of a graduate student in mathematics.

I only understand bits and pieces of it. I think I understand enough to say that a really good book on this topic should identify mathematical structures (lattices, algebras) that can be associated with every set of statements that can be considered a "theory of physics", and then classify theories by additional conditions satisfied by these structures. Then the book should describe the most interesting classes of theories. There is however no such book. The closest thing I can think of is the article "Quantum probability theory" by Redei and Summers, which contains a classification of (generalized) probability theories defined by von Neumann algebras.

http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0601158
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Geofleur
Fredrik said:
I only understand bits and pieces of it. I think I understand enough to say that a really good book on this topic should identify mathematical structures (lattices, algebras) that can be associated with every set of statements that can be considered a "theory of physics", and then classify theories by additional conditions satisfied by these structures. Then the book should describe the most interesting classes of theories.

That's exactly the sort of thing I had in mind with my question! If there are no books on the subject, and if the only paper is about the quantum aspects, perhaps this would be a good research topic?
 
The paper mentions that non-commutative von Neumann algebras lead to classical theories, so the classical theories are included in the framework defined by the paper. Unfortunately I don't understand this well enough to explain the details.
 
Thanks for the information, I appreciate it!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K