- 16,031
- 7,950
Yesterday I saw a 10-year-and-3-month necropost on a photography forum. It was attached to a thread about Sony digital camera xxxx [vintage 2001]. The question? "How does it compare to Sony yyyy [vintage 2011]?"
The discussion revolves around a 10-year-old forum post comparing two Sony digital cameras, one from 2001 and the other from 2011. Participants express curiosity about the comparison and the advancements in digital imaging technology over the past decade.
Participants generally share a humorous and curious perspective, but there is no consensus on the actual comparison of the cameras or the improvements in digital imaging technology.
The discussion lacks specific technical details regarding the cameras' specifications or performance metrics, focusing instead on the social dynamics of necroposting and curiosity about technological advancements.
Readers interested in photography, digital imaging technology, or the culture of online forums may find this discussion engaging.
FlexGunship said:Well, now I'm curious... how did they compare? Has digital imaging improved in the last 10 years (and three months)?
You were supposed to wait 10 years and 4 months to ask that question.FlexGunship said:Well, now I'm curious... how did they compare? Has digital imaging improved in the last 10 years (and three months)?
[/QUOTE]FlexGunship said:My favorite necropost is one of the following style:
[QUOTE="Level 12 Necroposter]I totally agree.