Space and time and human imagination

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Rick16
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the assertion by user strangerep that "space and time are artifacts of our imagination," referencing Einstein's perspective on these concepts as tools for constructing mathematical models in physics. The conversation explores whether this idea aligns with advanced theories such as quantum field theory, string theory, or the holographic universe model. Participants debate the validity of considering space and time as mere mathematical constructs versus the reality of quantum fields, emphasizing the distinction between theoretical models and observable phenomena.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts
  • Familiarity with Einstein's theories and quotes
  • Knowledge of string theory fundamentals
  • Awareness of the holographic universe model
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of quantum field theory on the nature of space and time
  • Study Einstein's theories and their interpretations in modern physics
  • Explore the principles of string theory and its relation to spacetime
  • Investigate the holographic universe model and its scientific acceptance
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, advanced students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of space and time in modern science.

Rick16
Messages
158
Reaction score
46
TL;DR
Are space and time artifacts of the imagination?
I came across a post in another thread, which has since been closed, where strangerep writes "Space and time are artifacts of our imagination". I don't want to discuss this here. I just want to ask where one could read more about this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rick16 said:
I came across a post in another thread
Please provide a link.
 
Rick16 said:
The quote is from post #17.
All he means is that space and time are part of the model we use in relativity to make predictions. He refers to a quote from Einstein in his signature block, which you should be able to look up online to find its source.
 
strangerep writes:

“Space and time are artifacts of our imagination (see the Einstein quote in my signature block below). They are useful concepts to construct mathematical models of physical (i.e., experimentally perceived) events. What's real are the correlations exhibited by (various configurations of) correlata, i.e., quantum fields, or, in a suitable limit, classical fields+particles.”

This sounds to me like something that I have heard about before, that space and time do not exist at the fundamental level, but are only apparent in the macroscopic world. Is this a topic of advanced quantum field theory, of string theory? Does it belong to the holographic universe model? Is it something that is accepted as a serious theory, or does it still belong to the realm of speculation? Would somebody have reading recommendations about it?
 
Rick16 said:
strangerep writes:

“Space and time are artifacts of our imagination (see the Einstein quote in my signature block below). They are useful concepts to construct mathematical models of physical (i.e., experimentally perceived) events. What's real are the correlations exhibited by (various configurations of) correlata, i.e., quantum fields, or, in a suitable limit, classical fields+particles.”
The idea that space and time are mathematical artifacts, but quantum fields are not is ridiculous. A quantum field is, by definition, an abstract mathematical artifact. Even Hilbert Space is deeper down the mathematical rabbit hole than Euclidean or Lorentzian manifolds. Or, they are at least equally far down.
 
Rick16 said:
This sounds to me like something that I have heard about before, that space and time do not exist at the fundamental level
No, that's not what he was saying. He was just saying that, as I said in post #4, space and time are part of a model we use to make predictions. He contrasted that with actual events that we observe and measure, which are the things in reality that our models and their predictions are about.
 

Similar threads

High School The M paradox
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
489
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K