Special Relativity Book for Jackson Notation - Does it Exist?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around finding a rigorous special relativity (SR) text that utilizes the notation similar to that of Jackson's Electromagnetism, specifically focusing on 4-vectors and tensors, and covering the consequences of SR such as time dilation and length contraction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a need for a rigorous SR text that aligns with Jackson's notation and covers key concepts like time dilation and length contraction.
  • Another participant recommends the first three chapters of "A First Course in General Relativity" by Schutz as a suitable resource.
  • A different participant suggests a book by Gourgoulhon, noting its comprehensive coverage, but also acknowledges that Schutz may be more accessible for beginners.
  • There is a suggestion to read Schutz first for foundational knowledge before delving into Gourgoulhon for deeper understanding.
  • Participants share personal experiences and recommendations regarding the books mentioned, highlighting their usefulness and content.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that both Schutz and Gourgoulhon are valuable resources, but there is no consensus on which is definitively better for learning SR, as opinions vary based on individual preferences and learning goals.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the best approach to learning SR, indicating that the choice of text may depend on prior knowledge and specific learning objectives.

Maybe_Memorie
Messages
346
Reaction score
0
I haven't specifically studied SR yet. My only exposure to it has been in the classical field theory section of Jackson's Electromagnetism and Landau Lifshitz Classical Theory of Fields. I understood what was going on and how it was related to the electromagnetic field etc but I don't feel as if Ihave actually learned SR.

I'm looking for a rigorous special relativity text written in the same notation as Jackson (4-vectors and tensors) and which actually goes into the consequences of SR such as time dilation and length contraction.

Does such a text exist?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe_Memorie said:
I'm looking for a rigorous special relativity text written in the same notation as Jackson (4-vectors and tensors) and which actually goes into the consequences of SR such as time dilation and length contraction.

www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=730724

This is the absolute best book I personally know of on the subject. My opinions on it are summarized in that thread.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: madscientist_93
WannabeNewton said:
www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=730724

This is the absolute best book I personally know of on the subject. My opinions on it are summarized in that thread.
I had not seen that thread, or heard of this book before. It does look very good (so far based on the table of contents alone). I will have to get a copy for myself.

I still think that Schutz may be better for someone who just wants to pick up the basics of SR and tensors quickly, but Gourgoulhon (LOL that name) covers so much more. There's some stuff in there that I have wanted to read about for years.

So...Maybe_Memorie, consider getting both. My modified suggestion is that you read those three chapters in Schutz first, and then use Gourgoulhon when you're ready to go really deeply into the subject.
 
Fredrik said:
I had not seen that thread, or heard of this book before. It does look very good (so far based on the table of contents alone).

I wouldn't have heard of it either if it wasn't for George! He's introduced me to so many good books over the months (years?). I really recommend getting it.

Fredrik said:
I still think that Schutz may be better for someone who just wants to pick up the basics of SR and tensors quickly, but Gourgoulhon (LOL that name) covers so much more.

I definitely agree with you 100% on Schutz. And yeah, the name is pretty funny to say lol. I mean I'm probably butchering the pronounciation but to me it sounds like "goor ghoul own". I've had 4 years of French and I still can't pronounce these names xP
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 243 ·
9
Replies
243
Views
60K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K