Spin 2 theory and connection to GR

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of quantizing a massless spin 2 field in the context of general relativity (GR). The author asserts that the requirement for consistent self-interactions in a massless spin 2 theory inherently leads to linearized general coordinate invariance, which is a fundamental aspect of GR. This conclusion aligns with historical insights from physicists like Feynman, emphasizing that the graviton's interactions, including with itself, contribute to a theoretical framework indistinguishable from GR.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity (GR) principles
  • Familiarity with quantum field theory concepts
  • Knowledge of gauge symmetries in physics
  • Basic grasp of spin 2 particles and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of linearized general coordinate invariance in quantum gravity
  • Explore the role of gauge symmetries in quantum field theories
  • Investigate the historical context of spin 2 theories and their development
  • Examine the interactions of gravitons and their significance in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, researchers in quantum gravity, and students interested in the intersection of quantum field theory and general relativity.

kdv
Messages
345
Reaction score
5
http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.3735

I have a question about the paper that haushofer mentioned. In the paper, the author states that

Moving on to helicity 2, the required gauge symmetry is linearized general coordinate invariance. Asking for consistent self interactions leads essentially uniquely to GR and full general coordinate invariance .

I am not sure what this means. If we quantize GR, I know of course that we end up with a massless spin 2 graviton. Here, we treat the metric as a quantum field so it is clear that general covariance leads to a gauge symmetry in the quantum theory we obtain.

But let's say with start with quantizing a spin 2 classical field in a flat spacetime. We may have a gauge symmetry which a priori has nothing to do with spacetime coordinate transformation and general covariance. Is the author saying that consistency of a massless spin 2 theory automatically leads to a condition on the spacetime it evolves through? Even if initially the spin 2 particle has nothing to do with a metric? Or am I completely missing the point?
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is what the author is saying. This result has derived (with varying degrees of rigor) long ago, including by Feynman. Besides spin two, there is the feature that graviton interacts with everything, including other gravitons. It is this together with spin 2, that leads almost uniquely to a theory indistinguishable from GR.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K