Spin singlets and the Bell states

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter VantagePoint72
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bell Spin States
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of spin singlets and Bell states in the context of two spin-1/2 particles. Participants explore the mathematical expressions of these states and their implications for rotational invariance, focusing on the specific states ##|\Psi^- \rangle## and ##|\Phi^+ \rangle##.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that the spin singlet state is ##|\Psi^- \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|\uparrow_z \downarrow_z \rangle - |\downarrow_z \uparrow_z \rangle)## and discusses its rotational invariance.
  • Another participant asserts that the property of rotational invariance is held by ##|\Psi^- \rangle## and not by ##|\Phi^+ \rangle##, suggesting that this can be verified by working through the x-axis case.
  • A third participant provides calculations showing that the state ##|\Phi^+ \rangle## can be expressed in terms of the z-basis, supporting the claim that it has a similar property to ##|\Psi^- \rangle##.
  • Another participant notes that while ##|\Psi^- \rangle## picks up an overall minus sign, which is quantum mechanically irrelevant, they find this behavior odd given its supposed rotational invariance.
  • This participant expresses confusion regarding the behavior of ##|\Phi^+ \rangle##, suggesting it should not exhibit the same properties as described.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the properties of the states ##|\Psi^- \rangle## and ##|\Phi^+ \rangle##, particularly regarding their rotational invariance. There is no consensus on the implications of these properties, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference mathematical expressions and properties that may depend on specific definitions and assumptions about the states involved. The implications of the overall sign change in ##|\Psi^- \rangle## and the behavior of ##|\Phi^+ \rangle## are also noted as potentially unresolved issues.

VantagePoint72
Messages
820
Reaction score
34
Given two spin-1/2 particles, the overall spin of the pair decomposes into a spin singlet and a spin triplet. Using the Clebsch-Gordon series and referring to the z-axis, we find the spin singlet is:

##|\Psi^- \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|\uparrow_z \downarrow_z \rangle - |\downarrow_z \uparrow_z \rangle)##

The overall state is one of the Bell states and is given the standard label. Being a spin singlet is the same thing as being rotationally invariant. However, consider another of the Bell states:

##|\Phi^+ \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|\uparrow_z \uparrow_z \rangle + |\downarrow_z \downarrow_z \rangle)##

This state has an interesting property; it may also be expressed as:

##|\Phi^+ \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|\uparrow_x \uparrow_x \rangle + |\downarrow_x \downarrow_x \rangle)##

or, indeed,

##|\Phi^+ \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|\uparrow_{\hat{n}} \uparrow_{\hat{n}} \rangle + |\downarrow_{\hat{n}} \downarrow_{\hat{n}} \rangle)##

where ##{\hat{n}}## is an arbitrary unit vector. But isn't this property just a mathematical expression of rotational invariance? So how does that square with the fact that it is ##|\Psi^- \rangle## (not ##|\Phi^+ \rangle##) that is the spin singlet for a bipartite system of two spin-1/2 particles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's ##|\Psi^- \rangle## that has this property, not ##|\Phi^+ \rangle##. Work it out for the x case and you'll see.
 
I have worked it out for the x case, and the result holds:
##| \uparrow_x \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(| \uparrow_z \rangle + | \downarrow_z \rangle)##
##| \downarrow_x \rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(| \uparrow_z \rangle - | \downarrow_z \rangle)##

Hence:
##\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(| \uparrow_x \uparrow_x \rangle + | \downarrow_x \downarrow_x \rangle ##
##=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}}((| \uparrow_z \rangle + | \downarrow_z \rangle)(| \uparrow_z \rangle + | \downarrow_z \rangle) + (| \uparrow_z \rangle - | \downarrow_z \rangle)(| \uparrow_z \rangle - | \downarrow_z \rangle))##
##=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(| \uparrow_z \uparrow_z \rangle + | \downarrow_z \downarrow_z \rangle ##

The general statement is proved (and used extensively by) Preskill in http://www.theory.caltech.edu/people/preskill/ph229/notes/chap2.pdf (p.31)
 
Moreover, this property does not hold for ##|\Psi^- \rangle##, it picks up an overall minus sign. This is irrelevant quantum mechanically; however, it is still odd, given it is supposed to be rotationally invariant. I'm more put off by the behaviour of ##|\Phi^+ \rangle## though, it seems like it shouldn't do this. But, as Preskill shows, it does.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K