I Standard deviation and count rate

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the relationship between standard deviation and count rate in the context of radiation counting experiments. Participants clarify that counting rates follow a Poisson distribution, which approximates a Gaussian distribution at reasonable rates, leading to a 95% probability within ±2σ. However, there is confusion regarding the assertion that 2σ equals 0.05 times the count rate. The standard deviation for count rate is actually derived from the formula (r/t)^(1/2), where r is the count rate and t is the counting time. Ultimately, the consensus is to disregard the incorrect statement about the relationship between 2σ and count rate.
Zuzana
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I watched MIT course on Nuclear physics (13. Practical Radiation Counting Experiments on ytb) and I do not understand why 2*sigma (standard deviation) = 0.05* countRate. As far as I know, integral of normal distribution from -2sigma to 2 sigma gives 95 % probability, but how can 2*sigma equals 100%-95% of count rate?

Thank you for the answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello @Zuzana,
:welcome: ##\qquad##!
As you may know, a counting rate obeys a Poisson distribution. ( e.g. sheet 17 here ). For reasonable counting rates, such a Poisson distribution is very close to a Gaussian distribution ( ibid sheet 20 ). Hence the 95%.

##\ ##
 
u = measured mean
s = measured standard deviation

There is a 95% chance that the true mean lies in the interval
-1.96s+u to u+1.96s
 
Hornbein said:
u = measured mean
s = measured standard deviation

There is a 95% chance that the true mean lies in the interval
-1.96s+u to u+1.96s
yes, I understand this, but I do not understand why should 2*sigma = 0.05*countRate.
 
I don't know where you got that the standard deviation of count rate is count rate but the standard deviation for count rate r is r1/2 / t1/2 or (r / t)1/2 where t is the counting time.

Zuzana said:
and I do not understand why 2*sigma (standard deviation) = 0.05* countRate.
I don't understand this statement either. Perhaps you misinterpreted something in the video.

95% are between ±2σ meaning 5% is outside this interval or 2.5% above and 2.5% below.
 
Zuzana said:
yes, I understand this, but I do not understand why should 2*sigma = 0.05*countRate.
I don't understand it either. I'd say you should disregard this confused concept.
 
Assume that this is a case where by sheer coincidence, two sources of coherent single-frequency EM wave pulses with equal duration are both fired in opposing directions, with both carrying the same frequency and amplitude and orientation. These two waves meet head-on while moving in opposing directions, and their phases are precisely offset by 180 degrees so that each trough of one wave meets with the crest of the other. This should be true for both the electric and magnetic components of...
Back
Top