Stationary schrodinger equation (basic problems regarding the basis being used)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the stationary Schrödinger equation, focusing on the representation of the Hamiltonian operator in different bases, particularly the energy and position bases. Participants explore the implications of these representations and the relationships between states and wavefunctions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the application of the Hamiltonian operator in the context of different bases, specifically questioning why the position variable "x" is used when the Hamiltonian is represented in the energy basis.
  • Another participant explains the process of multiplying the stationary equation by a position state and describes how the Hamiltonian acts on wavefunctions, introducing the concept of representing the Hamiltonian in the position basis.
  • A further inquiry is made regarding the inner product of position basis vectors and the validity of a specific equation involving the Hamiltonian, leading to a discussion about the distinction between operators and numbers in this context.
  • Clarifications are provided about the representation of states and operators in the Hilbert space, emphasizing that the Hamiltonian can be represented as a differential operator in the position basis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to distinguish between states and wavefunctions, as well as the representation of the Hamiltonian in different bases. However, there remains some uncertainty and debate regarding specific mathematical steps and the implications of these representations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of careful definitions and the relationships between different representations of operators and states, but some mathematical steps remain unresolved or unclear.

roya
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
i can't seem to understand something very basic about the stationary equation (a "simple" eigenvalue problem):

H|Y>=E|Y>

H - hamiltonian operator
Y - an eigenstate or an eigenfunction of the hamiltonian
E - the eigenvalue of the eigenstate

as far as i understand, the hamilotian operator (H) is represented in the energy basis, and the eigenstates (Y) therefore form a basis that span the hilbert space of the system.

now this is where i get fairly confused. if the equation above is multiplied from the left by <x|, a bra representing one of the position states that form a position basis, then the equation is written as
H*Y(x)=E*Y(x)
BUT, it is also said that the hamiltonian is represented in the energy basis, so why is "x" being the variable in use here?
it seems as if the operator is in one basis, but the state is in a different one, but i know that i am wrong i just can't figure this out

i hope someone can help me here...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you multiply on the left by <x| you get:

[tex]<x|H|Y> = E<x|Y> = E Y(x)[/tex]

Note H can't be pulled out of the bracket since it's an operator. Now, H is an operator on the Hilbert space, not directly on the space of wavefunctions, but of course these spaces are really the same, so there should be a way of acting H on the wavefunction, and there is. Inserting a 1 in the form [itex]\int dx' |x'><x'|[/itex] we find:

[tex]<x|H|Y> = \int dx' <x|H|x'><x'|Y> = \int dx' H(x,x') Y(x')[/tex]

where I've defined [itex]H(x,x') = <x|H|x'>[/itex]. If you work this out, you'll find something like:

[tex]H(x,x') = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \delta''(x-x') + V(x) \delta(x-x')[/tex]

And then inserting this into the integral you find:

[tex]<x|H|Y> = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} Y''(x) + V(x) Y(x)[/tex]

which gives you the Schrödinger equation in the position basis.
 
oh very nice, this makes it a bit clearer, though i still have one more question.
i have covered the missing steps (finding the H acting on the position basis) though one step isn't clear to me. from what i know, the inner product of the two position basis vectors is:
<x|x'> = DiracDelta(x-x') (replacing the kronecker delta, moving from a discrete to a continuous space)

but in order to reach the final equation of H(x,x') which you have written down, this needs to be true:
<x|H|x'> = H<x|x'>
why is this true? i have tried entering a complete set in between, but i couldn't get the result above.

just to see if i actually get it now (hopefully), the state of the system is represented in the position basis, and the operator originally acts on the same hilbert space only under a different basis, and the idea is to find it's representation in the position base instead (did i get it right?)
 
Last edited:
Again, you need to be careful about the distinction between states and wavefunctions. An equation like:

[tex]<x|H|x'> = H <x|x'>[/tex]

makes no sense: the LHS is a number (depending on x and x') while the RHS is an operator, ie, a matrix on the infinite dimensional Hilbert space (also depending on x and x').

Now, what you said at the end of your last post is true. Specifically, we can represent the Hilbert space in a number of ways, the most common of which is the position basis, where there is a one-to-one correspondence between states and (square integrable) complex valued functions on the real numbers. In this basis, we can also represent Hilbert space operators (like H), typically by differential operators. For example, we know from experience that the Hamiltonian has the representation:

[tex]H |\psi> \leftrightarrow \left(-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{d^2}{dx^2} + V(x) \right) \psi(x)[/tex]

(note the thing in paranetheses on the RHS is not H, but a differential operator that represents it in the position basis). What this equation says is that if the state [itex]|\psi>[/itex] is represented in the position basis by the function [itex]\psi(x)[/itex], then the state on the LHS of the above equation is represented by the function on the RHS. To put the last sentence in equations:

[tex]<x|\psi> = \psi(x) \Rightarrow <x|H |\psi> = \left(-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{d^2}{dx^2} + V(x) \right) \psi(x)[/tex]

In the case we're concerned with, since [itex]<x|x'> = \delta(x-x')[/itex] (in other words, the wavefunction of the state [itex]|x'>[/itex] is [itex]\delta(x-x')[/itex]), we have:

[tex]<x|H|x'> = \left(-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{d^2}{dx^2} + V(x) \right) \delta(x-x')[/tex]

which is the formula I gave above.

You could also derive this from the more basic definition of the Hamiltonian (I'll put hats on things that are Hilbert space operators):

[tex]\hat{H} = \frac{\hat{p}^2}{2m} + V(\hat{x})[/tex]

With a little work, using the commutation relations [itex][\hat{x}, \hat{p}] = i \hbar[/itex] and the fact that [itex]|x'>[/itex] is an eigenstate of the operator [itex]\hat{x}[/itex] with eigenvalue x', you can derive the same formula without using the position basis at all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K