MHB Stochastic Taylor's Expansion (Ito Rule)

gnob
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Good day.

For $k\geq0$ a continuous function on $\mathbb{R}_+$ and $\{W_t\}$ a standard Brownian motion, could you help me find the Taylor's expansion of the following exponential: $e^{-\int_0^t k(s) dW_s}.$

For the case where $e^{-k W_t}$ where $k>0$ is a constant, I was able to recompute its Taylor's expansion as
$$
e^{-k W_t} = 1 - k\int_0^t e^{-kW_s}dW_s + \frac{1}{2}k^2\int_0^t e^{-kW_s}ds.
$$
But in the first exponential above, we have an integral exponent with a nonconstant $k,$ but a function. Please help me on this.

Thanks a lot in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gnob said:
Good day.

For $k\geq0$ a continuous function on $\mathbb{R}_+$ and $\{W_t\}$ a standard Brownian motion, could you help me find the Taylor's expansion of the following exponential: $e^{-\int_0^t k(s) dW_s}.$

For the case where $e^{-k W_t}$ where $k>0$ is a constant, I was able to recompute its Taylor's expansion as
$$
e^{-k W_t} = 1 - k\int_0^t e^{-kW_s}dW_s + \frac{1}{2}k^2\int_0^t e^{-kW_s}ds.
$$
But in the first exponential above, we have an integral exponent with a nonconstant $k,$ but a function. Please help me on this.

Thanks a lot in advance.

Honestly I'm not sure to give the correct answer to the question but if we consider a stochastic integral like...

$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{t} f \{W(s)\}\ d W(s)\ (1)$

... if f(x) is analytic around x=0, i.e. is...

$\displaystyle f \{W(s)\} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_{n}\ W^{n} (s)\ (2)$

... then the following formula can be applied...

$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{t} W^{n}(s)\ d W (s) = \frac{1}{n+1}\ W^{n+1} (t) - \frac{n}{2}\ \int_{0}^{t} W^{n-1} (s)\ d s\ (3)$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top