MHB Stochastic Taylor's Expansion (Ito Rule)

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding the Taylor expansion of the exponential function $e^{-\int_0^t k(s) dW_s}$, where $k(s)$ is a continuous function and $W_t$ is standard Brownian motion. The user successfully computed the expansion for the case of a constant $k$ as $e^{-k W_t} = 1 - k\int_0^t e^{-kW_s}dW_s + \frac{1}{2}k^2\int_0^t e^{-kW_s}ds$. However, they seek assistance with the more complex case involving a nonconstant function $k(s)$. A response suggests using a stochastic integral approach and applying a formula for analytic functions around $x=0$. The conversation emphasizes the challenge of extending known results to nonconstant scenarios in stochastic calculus.
gnob
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Good day.

For $k\geq0$ a continuous function on $\mathbb{R}_+$ and $\{W_t\}$ a standard Brownian motion, could you help me find the Taylor's expansion of the following exponential: $e^{-\int_0^t k(s) dW_s}.$

For the case where $e^{-k W_t}$ where $k>0$ is a constant, I was able to recompute its Taylor's expansion as
$$
e^{-k W_t} = 1 - k\int_0^t e^{-kW_s}dW_s + \frac{1}{2}k^2\int_0^t e^{-kW_s}ds.
$$
But in the first exponential above, we have an integral exponent with a nonconstant $k,$ but a function. Please help me on this.

Thanks a lot in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gnob said:
Good day.

For $k\geq0$ a continuous function on $\mathbb{R}_+$ and $\{W_t\}$ a standard Brownian motion, could you help me find the Taylor's expansion of the following exponential: $e^{-\int_0^t k(s) dW_s}.$

For the case where $e^{-k W_t}$ where $k>0$ is a constant, I was able to recompute its Taylor's expansion as
$$
e^{-k W_t} = 1 - k\int_0^t e^{-kW_s}dW_s + \frac{1}{2}k^2\int_0^t e^{-kW_s}ds.
$$
But in the first exponential above, we have an integral exponent with a nonconstant $k,$ but a function. Please help me on this.

Thanks a lot in advance.

Honestly I'm not sure to give the correct answer to the question but if we consider a stochastic integral like...

$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{t} f \{W(s)\}\ d W(s)\ (1)$

... if f(x) is analytic around x=0, i.e. is...

$\displaystyle f \{W(s)\} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_{n}\ W^{n} (s)\ (2)$

... then the following formula can be applied...

$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{t} W^{n}(s)\ d W (s) = \frac{1}{n+1}\ W^{n+1} (t) - \frac{n}{2}\ \int_{0}^{t} W^{n-1} (s)\ d s\ (3)$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
There is a nice little variation of the problem. The host says, after you have chosen the door, that you can change your guess, but to sweeten the deal, he says you can choose the two other doors, if you wish. This proposition is a no brainer, however before you are quick enough to accept it, the host opens one of the two doors and it is empty. In this version you really want to change your pick, but at the same time ask yourself is the host impartial and does that change anything. The host...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K