String Theory and Twistor Theory Combined

Click For Summary
Twistor theory, developed by Roger Penrose, and string theory, popularized by Ed Witten, have historically been inconsistent, with twistor space utilizing 3+1 dimensions and complex components. Recent developments suggest a potential reconciliation, as Witten reportedly sent Penrose a 100-page document placing strings within twistor space, which may have occurred within the last year. This correspondence has sparked renewed interest in twistor theory, as noted by Penrose in a talk at Penn State. The discussion highlights the possibility of new insights emerging from this collaboration. Further references and details about this evolving relationship between the two theories are sought by participants in the conversation.
Naty1
Messages
5,605
Reaction score
40
Until recently the twistor theory of Roger Penrose on one hand and string theory on another, epitomized by Ed Witten and many others, have been inconsistent.

Twistor space uses 3+1 dimensions and is a complex space in additional dimensions with imaginary components, analogous to the complex number structure of quantum theory. String theory has I guess now 10 +1 real dimensions...although that can vary by theory. Twistors give rise to spin networks which have been discussed in other threads here.

According the a one line comment from Roger Penrose in a video from another thread here, Ed Witten has sent Penrose a 100 page document placing strings in twistor space...unsure when, sounds like in the last year or so.

And apparently some insightful ideas arise...anyone know anything more or have any references for reading??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The reference was in a talk at Penn State June last year by Roger Penrose...honoring Abhay Ashtekar...Penrose made it sound like the correpoondence was a recent event that might restimulate interest in his twistor theory...The website has caused my computer to lock up three times just now , so I'll try again tomorrow.
 
I forgot to mention in my original post that the second paragraph desription of twistor theory's inconsistency with string theory in my original post is what I believe Roger Penrose said in a video related to another thread...it's his summary of the situation, not a conclusion I drew...Penrose he was of course ebullient that a guy of Witten's stature might "resurrect" the old twistor theory...
 
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
8K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
12K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
10K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K