Subalgebras of nipotent algebras

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jostpuur
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the existence of subalgebras within nilpotent Lie algebras, specifically addressing the construction of a subalgebra \mathfrak{h} with codimension one. It is established that if \mathfrak{g} is a finite-dimensional nilpotent Lie algebra, a subalgebra \mathfrak{h} can be formed by taking \mathfrak{g}_1=[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}] and adding arbitrary vectors. The conversation further explores whether this construction holds true under the condition that each element of the algebra is nilpotent, referencing Engel's theorem to support the argument. The conclusion affirms that the construction of such a subalgebra is valid regardless of the nilpotency of the algebra.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of finite-dimensional nilpotent Lie algebras
  • Familiarity with the concepts of subalgebras and ideals
  • Knowledge of Engel's theorem and its implications
  • Basic principles of Lie algebra theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of Engel's theorem in detail
  • Explore the properties of nilpotent Lie algebras
  • Investigate the construction of subalgebras in various algebraic structures
  • Learn about the implications of codimension in algebraic contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students of abstract algebra interested in the properties and structures of Lie algebras, particularly those focusing on nilpotent algebras and subalgebra constructions.

jostpuur
Messages
2,112
Reaction score
19
I know that if [itex]\mathfrak{g}[/itex] is a finite dimensional nilpotent Lie algebra, then a subalgebra [itex]\mathfrak{h}[/itex] with precisely one dimension less exists.

If [itex]\mathfrak{g}_1=[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}][/itex] has the codimension of one, then choose it. If instead
[tex]\textrm{dim}(\mathfrak{g})-\textrm{dim}(\mathfrak{g}_1)=n>1[/tex],
then add some arbitrary vectors to it like this
[tex] \mathfrak{h}=\mathfrak{g}_1\oplus X_1\oplus\cdots\oplus X_{n-1}[/tex]
and this is a subalgebra since
[tex] [\mathfrak{h},\mathfrak{h}]\subset [\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]=\mathfrak{g}_1\subset \mathfrak{h}.[/tex]

My question is, that is it possible to easily prove that such subalgebra with codimension of one exists also, if we don't know the nilpotency of the algebra, but instead only know that each element of the algebra is nilpotent, so that [itex]X^n=0[/itex] for all [itex]X\in\mathfrak{g}[/itex] for some n.

This should be true, because it can be shown that if an element is nilpotent, it is also ad-nilpotent, and the Engel's theorem says, that if each element of the Lie algebra is ad-nilpotent, then the algebra is nilpotent too. However, I'm now struggling with the proof of the Engel's theorem, so I would like some other way.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you already have proven it. Your construction works regardless of any properties of the Lie algebra. Since ##\mathfrak{g}/[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]## is Abelian, you only needed that ##[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]\subsetneq \mathfrak{g}## is a proper subalgebra. Such a subalgebra is even an ideal.

Only if ##[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]=\mathfrak{g}## as e.g. for semisimple Lie algebras we get empty statements which are trivially true, but the construction always yields the entire Lie algebra.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K