Subtracting Exponents with Same Base but Different Exponent

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical operation of subtracting exponents with the same base but different exponents, specifically focusing on the expression (2 ^ 30 - 2 ^ 29)/2. Participants explore the steps involved in simplifying this expression without a calculator, while also addressing related problems involving exponent rules.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks how to simplify (2 ^ 30 - 2 ^ 29)/2 without a calculator, noting that the answer is 2 ^ 28.
  • Another participant demonstrates the simplification by factoring out 2 ^ 28 from the expression.
  • A different participant attempts to apply similar reasoning to a GRE practice problem involving 3^(n+2) / [3^(n+3) - 3^(n+1)], claiming to arrive at a different answer than the key suggests.
  • Some participants discuss the rules for cancelling exponents and express confusion about why certain terms cannot be cancelled in the original problem.
  • One participant provides a step-by-step breakdown of the simplification process for the original problem, emphasizing the cancellation of terms and factoring.
  • Another participant challenges the correctness of the answer key for the GRE problem, providing their own calculations and reasoning.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the simplification of exponent expressions. While some agree on the steps to simplify (2 ^ 30 - 2 ^ 29)/2, there is disagreement on the correct approach to the GRE problem, with conflicting answers presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific rules for cancelling exponents, but there is uncertainty about their application in different contexts. The discussion includes potential misunderstandings of the rules as they apply to different bases and expressions.

Who May Find This Useful

Students preparing for standardized tests like the GRE, individuals seeking clarification on exponent rules, and those interested in mathematical problem-solving techniques may find this discussion beneficial.

baba
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How do you do this problem (without a calculator) that looks deceivingly simple, yet is utterly confusing. (2 ^ 30 - 2 ^ 29)/2 = ?. The answer is
2 ^ 28, but how was this done without using a calculator. The furthest I can take this without using a calculator is 2 ^ 29 - 2 ^ 28
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
2 ^ 29 - 2 ^ 28 = 2^28(2-1) = 2^28(1) = 2^28
 
230- 229= 2(229)- 229=
(2-1)229= 229 so (230-229)/2= 229/2= 228.
 
I am trying to work this actual problem that is in my GRE practice book. Looking at the way it is worked i still need help. Please let me know if you could help in any way.
 
Complete solutions have been posted above. What specific help are you looking for? If you explain which concept you're having difficulty with, someone might be able to help you better.

Edit : If your problem is entirely unrelated to the prior content of this thread, state the COMPLETE question in a new thread.
 
Last edited:
Well i understand how the orginal problem 2^30-2^29/2 becomes 2^29 -2^28 because you subract 2^1 from each exponent. Why isn't the 2 at the bottom canceled out? And where is the (2-1) coming from? The rule in the GRE manual for example 5^7/5^4 becomes 5^3 thus cancelling the denominator of 5. Please help me clear up any confusions.
 
Let's try being more explicit then:
(230-229)/2

Step one: cancel the two in the denominator. TO do this, you divide each term by 2, meaning (for this specific scenario), you subtract one from each exponent

229-228

Step two: Factor 228 from all the terms.

228(21-20)

Step three: Remembering some basic exponent rules, we clean up the equation a bit (specifically a number to the power of 1 or 0)

228(2-1)

Step four: Finish solving by calculating 2-1

228(1) = 228
 
i have the same problem with the problem above. this is the problem:

3^(n+2) / [3^(n+3) - 3^(n+1)]

the answer key says that the answer is 1/3 but when I solved for it, the answer is 3/8.. what is really the correct answer and how will it be solved?
 
If you only have powers of 3, you cannot possibly have a factor of 8= 2^3!

The correct answer is 1/3 as you were told- write 3^{n+2} as 3(3^{n+1}) and cancel.
 
  • #10
HallsofIvy said:
If you only have powers of 3, you cannot possibly have a factor of 8= 2^3!

Unless you happen to have 8 = 3^2-3^0.

The correct answer is 1/3 as you were told- write 3^{n+2} as 3(3^{n+1}) and cancel.

I get 3/8:

\frac{3^{n+2}}{3^{n+3}-3^{n+1}} = \frac{3 3^{n+1}}{3^2 3^{n+1}-3^{n+1}} = \frac{3}{3^2-3^0} = \frac{3}{9-1} = \frac{3}{8}

Perhaps HallsofIvy and the person who wrote the book's answer key missed the "-3^(n+1)" in the denominator?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K