MHB Sum of a discrete finite sequence

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding a tight upper bound for the sum of the sequence {bi} defined as bi = ai * (1/2^i), given the sum of the sequence {ai} is known (x). It is noted that if the terms of {ai} are non-negative, the sum of {bi} can range between x/2^k and x/2, depending on the distribution of the ai values. The extreme cases illustrate that without additional information about the ai values, a tighter bound cannot be established. The attempt to use the convexity of 1/2^i did not yield conclusive results. Overall, the conclusion is that more information about the sequence {ai} is necessary for a precise calculation of the sum of {bi}.
bincy
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hii everyone,

I have a sequence {ai,1<= i <=k} where i know the sum of this sequence(say x).
I want to know the sum of another sequence {bi, 1<=i <=k}(at least a tight upper bound) where bi=ai*(1/2^i).

Or in other words, if you know the sum of the ratio sequence and sum of 1 sequence, how to find out the sum of the other sequence(can we)?

I tried using the convexity of 1/2^i, but couldn't get anything.

regards,
Bincy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bincybn said:
Hii everyone,

I have a sequence {ai,1<= i <=k} where i know the sum of this sequence(say x).
I want to know the sum of another sequence {bi, 1<=i <=k}(at least a tight upper bound) where bi=ai*(1/2^i).

Or in other words, if you know the sum of the ratio sequence and sum of 1 sequence, how to find out the sum of the other sequence(can we)?

I tried using the convexity of 1/2^i, but couldn't get anything.
In general, there is very little that you can say about $\sum_{i=1}^ka_i/2^i$.

I assume that the terms in the sequence $\{a_i\}$ are non-negative (if not, then there is even less that you can say about the sum of the series). If you think about the possible values of the $a_i$ (subject to the condition that their sum is $x$), then at one extreme you could have $a_1=x$ and $a_i=0$ for $2\leqslant i\leqslant k$. At the other extreme you could have $a_k=x$ and $a_i=0$ for $1\leqslant i\leqslant k-1$. In the first case, $\sum_{i=1}^ka_i/2^i = x/2$. In the second case, $\sum_{i=1}^ka_i/2^i = x/2^k$. So (unless you have further in formation about the $a_i$), all you can say about the sum of the $b_i$ is that it lies between $x/2^k$ and $x/2$. Presumably that does no qualify as a tight bound!
 
First trick I learned this one a long time ago and have used it to entertain and amuse young kids. Ask your friend to write down a three-digit number without showing it to you. Then ask him or her to rearrange the digits to form a new three-digit number. After that, write whichever is the larger number above the other number, and then subtract the smaller from the larger, making sure that you don't see any of the numbers. Then ask the young "victim" to tell you any two of the digits of the...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K