MHB Sum of the measures of the interior angles of a heptagon

AI Thread Summary
The sum of the interior angles of a heptagon is 1260°, calculated using the formula (n-2)180°, where n is the number of sides. For a polygon with a sum of interior angle measures of 3600°, it has 22 sides, derived from rearranging the same formula. Each exterior angle of a regular octagon measures 45°, as the sum of exterior angles for any polygon is always 360°. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these formulas for solving polygon angle problems. Accurate calculations are essential for determining angle measures in various polygon types.
yormmanz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
PLEASE HELP1.What is the sum of the measures of the interior angles of a heptagon?

A. 1260∘
B. 2520∘
C. 900∘
D. 1800∘

my answer is C

5.If the sum of the interior angle measures of a polygon is 3600∘, how many sides does the polygon have?
A. 22 sides
B. 20 sides
C. 18 sides
D. 10 sides

MY ANSWER ?

3.What is the angle measure of each exterior angle of a regular octagon?
A. 45∘
B. 135∘
C. 360∘
D. 1080∘

MY ANSWER ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
couple of pieces of information to assist you ...

the sum of the interior angles of a convex n-gon is $(n-2)180^\circ$

the sum of the exterior angles of a convex n-gon is $360^\circ$
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
22K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top