Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Sun can absorb almost 200,000 more Suns?

  1. May 10, 2014 #1
    The maximum mass-energy allowable inside a sphere to ensure a static Star is obtained from Buchdahl’s Theorem:


    Calculations show that Sun can absorb almost 200,000 more Suns and remain it its current radius and stay away from collapsing.

    Is this correct?
  2. jcsd
  3. May 10, 2014 #2


    User Avatar
    2015 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    With 200 000 times its mass, the sun would be a black hole where the event horizon would be roughly at the current surface of sun. For realistic objects, this is certainly beyond a collapse.

    If you try to produce such an object by adding more and more mass from the outside, however, you produce a star with extremely strong stellar winds that will prevent more mass from getting added.
  4. May 10, 2014 #3
    I was essentially trying to picture a thought experiment here.

    How much mass-energy could fit into the current radius of Sun, referring to the condition of a static Star obtained from Buchdahl’s Theorem, which sets the upper limit.
  5. May 10, 2014 #4


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Buchdahl's theorem assumes that the material the object (in this case the sun) is made of is incompressible and of constant density, i.e. that it's proper volume doesn't shrink under pressure. This isn't the case for the sun, so I wouldn't expect the theoretical maximum mass given by the theorem to be reached.
  6. May 10, 2014 #5

    Vanadium 50

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2015 Award

    Pretty much the only conditions of the theorem that the sun satisfies are that it has a mass and a radius.
  7. May 11, 2014 #6
    Let me quote from Sean Carroll in his book Spacetime and Geometry.

    After introducing the maximum mass-energy allowable equation on page 234 he writes:

    "Thus, if we try to squeeze a greater mass than this inside a radius R, general relativity admits no static solutions; a star that shrinks to such a size must inevitably keep shrinking, eventually forming a black hole. We derived this result from the rather strong assumption that the density is constant, but it continues to hold when that assumption considerably weakened."
  8. May 11, 2014 #7


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Your original post:
    didn't state this. Your followup:
    basically asserts correctly that Buchdal's theorem gives an upper limit to the mass that would fit into an object with the circumference of the sun. (We could quibble some over the difference between "radius of the sun" and "circumference of the sun", but I'm currently not thinking that the issue is important enough to argue about).

    The point that the theoretical upper limit given by the theorem wouldn't be reached if you used the hydrogen/helium/other mix that the sun uses is the point I was trying to convey.

  9. May 11, 2014 #8
    Can you explain the difference and why is it so?
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted

Similar Discussions: Sun can absorb almost 200,000 more Suns?
  1. The Sun (Replies: 3)

  2. The sun (Replies: 17)

  3. More suns found (Replies: 2)

  4. Can we colonize the Sun? (Replies: 16)