Exploring Supermassive Black Holes: Understanding Orbiting Stars and Gravity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter curiousphoton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blackholes
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of stars orbiting supermassive black holes (SMBHs), particularly focusing on the nature of orbits when the black hole is not actively consuming surrounding matter. Participants explore the implications of gravity and orbital mechanics in the context of general relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how stars maintain their orbits around a supermassive black hole when it is not actively consuming matter, suggesting that orbits might be elongated like those in our solar system.
  • Another participant references real-time data from the UCLA Galactic Center Group, indicating that stars do orbit the SMBH in our galaxy.
  • A theoretical perspective is introduced, stating that at sufficient distances from a black hole, the gravitational effects are indistinguishable from those of a normal star, allowing for both circular and elliptical orbits.
  • Further clarification is provided that while orbits far from the event horizon behave similarly to those around other massive bodies, closer orbits can become unstable and chaotic as they approach the event horizon.
  • One participant notes that the mass of a star does not change when it becomes a black hole, and thus the orbital velocity of surrounding stars remains unaffected if the Sun were to become a black hole.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the nature of orbits around SMBHs, with some agreeing on the similarity of orbits at a distance while others highlight the complexities that arise closer to the black hole. No consensus is reached regarding the specific characteristics of these orbits.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the behavior of orbits at different distances from a black hole and the implications of general relativity, which remain unresolved. The distinction between active and quiet SMBHs is also noted but not fully explored.

curiousphoton
Messages
117
Reaction score
2
Hello,

I was watching a show on one of DirectTV's Science channels last night about supermassive black holes. They stated the these supermassive black holes exist in two phases : 1. When they are sucking in everything around them (stars, planets, moons, etc). 2. When they aren't sucking in everything around them.

Question: When the supermassive black hole is in Phase 2 (not sucking in stars), how to the stars stay in orbit around the hole? The planets in our solar system orbit the sun in a slightly elliptical manner, rather than perfectly circular. This is due to our sun's gravity accelerating our planets', then pulling it back in, no? I was thinking with a supermassive black hole, wouldn't the stars around that black hole orbit in an extremely obvious elongated elliptical shape?


*Note: I wasn't sure what forum to post this in but figured black holes = gravity = einstein = GR...
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The UCLA Galactic Center Group actually has real-time data of stars orbiting the SMBH in our galaxy.

See: http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~ghezgroup/gc/pictures/orbitsMovie.shtml
 
From a more theoretical perspective, when you are far enough away from a black hole, you cannot tell the difference between it and a normal star. So for all intents and purposes, large orbits around black holes are the same as orbits around any other body. You can have circular, or elliptical orbits just as with any other body. Things get strange as you get closer to the hole though, with things like unstable circular orbits and zones where you cannot orbit at all. But I think the vast majority of stellar objects in orbit around SMBHs do not fall into these categories.
 
As Nabeshin mentioned when far enough away from the SMBH event horizon things will go unnoticed due to the amount of mass the star once had isn't changing, it is just getting condensed according to the Schwarzschild radius. In fact our orbital velocity would not change if the Sun became a black hole. Now as an object gets closer and closer to the event horizon their orbit will change dramatically, turning quite chaotic. The only difference between a quiet SMBH (within our own Milky Way) and an active SMBH (like the one in M87) is that all of the stars which were close enough or inside the event horizon have been sucked in, leaving stars that were far enough away, untouched. Other than that they are pretty much the same.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K