Supermoon Monday: Closest Approach in 70 Years

  • Context: Stargazing 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hagar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approach Years
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of the supermoon, specifically the supermoon that occurred on November 14, 2016, which was noted as the closest approach of the moon in 70 years. Participants explore various aspects of supermoons, including their visibility, differences from regular full moons, and the conditions under which they occur.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the supermoon is the closest full moon in 70 years, while others express skepticism about the visibility differences without advanced equipment.
  • One participant mentions that the angular size difference is apparent, while another argues that the difference is not easily noticeable without direct comparison.
  • There are discussions about the brightness of the supermoon and whether it is significantly different from other full moons.
  • Participants share personal observations of the supermoon, with some noting it appeared larger and brighter than usual.
  • Questions arise regarding the definitions of supermoon, full moon, and new moon, with some participants seeking clarification on their relationships to apogee and perigee.
  • There is a debate about whether full moons always occur at apogee and new moons at perigee, with conflicting views presented.
  • Some participants express a desire to understand the orbital mechanics of the moon and Earth, including the inclination angles and the nature of eclipses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple competing views regarding the visibility and significance of the supermoon, as well as the definitions and relationships of lunar phases to apogee and perigee. There is no consensus on these points.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the visibility of the supermoon compared to regular full moons and the conditions under which different lunar phases occur. There are also unresolved questions about the orbital mechanics of the moon and Earth.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those curious about lunar phenomena, astronomy enthusiasts, and individuals seeking to understand the mechanics of moon phases and their visibility.

  • #31
Janus said:
In this image, yes it is. However, Take two quarters and put one 8 feet away and the other 9 feet away and you will have a good representation of how the moon appears to the naked eye at perigee and apogee. Now if these quarters are against a plain background, and far enough apart that you can't directly compare them side by side, you would be hard pressed to notice the difference in their apparent size.

Betcha a silver quarter I can see the difference. The lunar angular diameter can vary from 29.43 arc minutes at apogee to 33.5 arc minutes at perigee—over 4 minutes of arc -- or an increase of around 14% in apparent diameter or 30% in apparent area . Of course, that is according to WikiLeaks-a-pedia...and they got it from NASA. They wouldn't lie to us would they? :))
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
840
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K