I am reading Griffiths and I am having trouble interpreting the results of measuring the x component of spin on a spin-up particle.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

If you have a spin up particle, my understanding is that it is assumed to be up in the preferred axis, z. I would think that measuring its x component should give half probability of h-bar/2 and half of negative h-bar/2. But what I get is h-bar/2 times spin down (down in z axis right?):

[itex]Sx\uparrow=\frac{\hbar}{2}

\left( \begin{array}{ccc}

0 & 1 \\

1 & 0 \end{array} \right)

\left( \begin{array}{ccc}

1 \\

0 \end{array} \right)

=\frac{\hbar}{2}\downarrow[/itex]

I don't see why this would make any sense. You measure the x component of the spin of a spin-up particle and get h-bar over 2 times spin down? Does that mean the particle is now spin down on the z axis? Shouldn't it be on the x axis now that we measured it in respect to the x component?

Also, just to be clear: the generic spin-up spinor without a (z) superscript implies it is a spinor of the z axis right?

[itex]X=X^{(z)}[/itex] ?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Sx acting on up spin particle confusion

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**