Symmetries in quantum mechanics and the change of operators

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the transformation of operators in quantum mechanics under symmetry transformations, particularly focusing on the relationship between unitary operators and the changes in state and operators. The scope includes theoretical aspects of quantum mechanics and operator algebra.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that under a symmetry transformation, the state changes as ##|\psi' \rangle = U|\psi \rangle##, leading to the conclusion that ##A' = UAU^{\dagger}## if expectation values remain unchanged.
  • Another participant questions the definition of the operator ##U## and clarifies that if ##|\psi' \rangle = U|\psi \rangle##, then ##A' = UAU^{\dagger}##, while if ##|\psi \rangle = U|\psi' \rangle##, then ##A' = U^{\dagger}AU##.
  • A participant references Sakurai's text, noting that it discusses discrete symmetries and raises a question about the correct form of the operator transformation involving the translation operator ##\tau## and the potential ##V(x)##.
  • Another participant argues that there is a distinction between the operator ##\hat{V}## and its value ##V(x)##, emphasizing that ##V(x)## is a number and does not behave like an operator under transformations.
  • This participant provides a detailed explanation of how the operator acts on position eigenstates and the implications of applying the translation operator on both sides of the equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct transformation of operators under symmetry transformations, with no consensus reached on the specific forms or interpretations of the transformations discussed.

Contextual Notes

The discussion involves nuances in operator algebra and the definitions of operators versus their values, which may lead to different interpretations of the transformations. There are also unresolved aspects regarding the application of operators in the context of symmetry transformations.

Lebnm
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
When we make a symmetrie transformation in a quantum system, the state ##|\psi \rangle## change to ## |\psi' \rangle = U|\psi \rangle##, where ##U## is a unitary or antiunitary operator, and the operator ##A## change to ##A'##. If we require that the expections values of operators don't change, we have $$\langle \psi '| A' | \psi ' \rangle= \langle \psi | U^{\dagger}A'U | \psi \rangle =\langle \psi | A | \psi \rangle,$$ what suggest that ##A' = UAU^{\dagger}##. However, in some textbooks, like Sakurai, the change in the operator is ##A' = U^{\dagger}AU##. Why this difference appear? They are equivalent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check to make sure of the definition of ##U##. Are they saying ##|\psi'\rangle = U |\psi\rangle## or ##|\psi\rangle = U |\psi'\rangle##?

In the first case, ##A' = U A U^\dagger##, in the second case, ##A' = U^\dagger A U##
 
Thanks for answering. I think it's the first case. In section 4.3, Sakurai talk about discrete symmetries. The first example is the lattice translation; he considerer a periodic potential ##V## and define the translation operator ##\tau## such that ##\tau (l) |x \rangle = |x + l \rangle ## (##| x \rangle## is a eigenstate of the position operator). So he write $$\tau ^{\dagger}(a) V(x) \tau (a) = V(x + a).$$ But shouldn't it be: ##\tau(a) V(x) \tau ^{\dagger}(a) = V(x + a)##?
 
I think it's confusing to mix up the operator ##\hat{V}## with its value ##V(x)##, which is just a number. So here's the way I would say it:

##\hat{V}## is an operator which acts on position eigenstates as follows:

##\hat{V} |x\rangle = V(x) |x\rangle##

The ##V(x)## on the right side of the equals is just a number, not an operator, so acting on it with ##\tau(a)## or ##\tau^\dagger(a)## would do nothing. Similarly,

##\hat{V} |x+a\rangle = V(x+a) |x+a\rangle##

which is equivalent to:

##\hat{V} \tau(a) |x\rangle = V(x+a) \tau(a) |x\rangle##

Now, act on both sides with ##\tau^\dagger(a)##:

##\tau^\dagger(a) \hat{V} \tau(a) |x\rangle = \tau^\dagger(a) V(x+a) \tau(a) |x\rangle##

But remember, on the right-hand side, ##V(x+a)## is just a number, not an operator. So ##\tau^\dagger(a)## commutes with it, to give:

##\tau^\dagger(a) V(x+a) \tau(a) |x\rangle = V(x+a) \tau^\dagger(a) \tau(a) |x\rangle = V(x) |x\rangle## (since ##\tau^\dagger(a) = (\tau(a))^{-1}##).

So we have:
##\tau^\dagger(a) \hat{V} \tau(a) |x\rangle = V(x+a) |x\rangle##

So ##\tau^\dagger(a) \hat{V} \tau(a)## is the operator which acts on ##|x\rangle## and returns ##V(x+a) |x\rangle##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Avodyne and Lebnm

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
498
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
239
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K