Syntax for a sequence in a set X

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter imurme8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence Set
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the appropriate syntax for describing sequences in mathematical notation, particularly whether it is acceptable to use the element symbol instead of the word "in" when referring to sequences within a set, specifically the set of real numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that it is common shorthand to say a sequence of real numbers x_n is a sequence "in R".
  • One participant mentions that they have only seen the phrasing "a sequence in \mathbb{R}" in a reference text by Rudin.
  • Another participant notes that the set of sequences with elements in a set A is typically denoted by A^{\mathbb N}, and the set of functions from A to B is written as B^A.
  • One participant argues against the use of the element symbol, stating that it would be a serious abuse of notation and suggests saying "Given a sequence (x_n)_n with each x_n \in \mathbb{R}" instead.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the acceptability of using the element symbol in this context, indicating that there is no consensus on the matter.

imurme8
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Syntax for a sequence "in" a set X

It is well-known shorthand to say that a sequence of real numbers x_n is a sequence "in R". (Of course we do not mean that the function x_n is an element of R). In such a case, is it permissible to replace the word "in" by the element symbol, or is this not accepted usage?

E.g. "Given a sequence {x_n} \in \mathbb{R}..." Is this OK?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I just had a quick flip through Rudin and I only ever saw "a sequence in [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex]".
 


Usually, the set of sequences which elements in a set A is denoted by [itex]A^{\mathbb N}[/itex].
More generally, if A and B are two sets, then the set of functions from A to B is written [itex]B^A[/itex].
 


imurme8 said:
It is well-known shorthand to say that a sequence of real numbers x_n is a sequence "in R". (Of course we do not mean that the function x_n is an element of R). In such a case, is it permissible to replace the word "in" by the element symbol, or is this not accepted usage?

E.g. "Given a sequence {x_n} \in \mathbb{R}..." Is this OK?

No, this is not permissible. This would be a serious abuse of notation and it would likely cause trouble.

One should say "Given a sequence [itex](x_n)_n[/itex] with each [itex]x_n\in \mathbb{R}[/itex]".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K