Synthetic plastics without fossil fuels

  • Thread starter Thread starter robynmc
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the potential for mass-producing synthetic plastics and polymers from non-fossil fuel sources, specifically exploring bioplastics and natural polymers. Participants emphasize the necessity of a carbon source for plastic production, noting that while bioplastics are currently being developed, they are expensive and face practical challenges. The conversation highlights the limitations of green energy in industrial processes and suggests that nuclear energy may be required for high-density energy needs. Additionally, natural polymers like plant cellulose and animal fibers are presented as viable alternatives to traditional plastics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bioplastics and their current market status
  • Knowledge of carbon feedstocks and their role in plastic production
  • Familiarity with energy sources, particularly nuclear energy and its applications in industrial processes
  • Awareness of natural polymers, such as cellulose and animal fibers, and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advancements in bioplastics and their production methods
  • Investigate the role of nuclear energy in chemical processes for plastic manufacturing
  • Explore the feasibility of using natural polymers as alternatives to synthetic plastics
  • Examine case studies of companies innovating with sustainable materials, such as mushroom-based products
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, environmental scientists, materials engineers, and anyone interested in sustainable alternatives to fossil fuel-based plastics.

robynmc
Messages
8
Reaction score
6
Could you help me find resources about this? I searched synthetic industrial plastics and it didn't return much.
I'm not that sure how to frame the question, what the question is. I'm interested to know how/whether plastics and other polymers and so on might be mass produced from simpler forms than processed hydrocarbons. What might that side of the fossil fuel industry to look like in 50 or 100 years, from a technical perspective not political. Possibilities.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Rayon. Cellophane. Where do you wish to start?
 
Try searching bioplastics. It's being done right now, but at high cost. The first page of results has information about the chemistry, sources of the raw materials, recyclability, and land needed. Possibilities, yes, but practical realities override wishful thinking.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Isopod, berkeman and hutchphd
hutchphd said:
Rayon. Cellophane. Where do you wish to start?
Trying to work out what i want to know, as I say, but for example I've heard it suggested high grade plastics are an end to which the rest of oil refining is almost just an economy of scale. Is it feasible that scaled up chem labs will ever displace refinery sources entirely? Even in principle
 
jrmichler said:
Try searching bioplastics. It's being done right now, but at high cost. The first page of results has information about the chemistry, sources of the raw materials, recyclability, and land needed. Possibilities, yes, but practical realities override wishful thinking.
Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and hutchphd
robynmc said:
Could you help me find resources about this? I searched synthetic industrial plastics and it didn't return much.
I'm not that sure how to frame the question, what the question is. I'm interested to know how/whether plastics and other polymers and so on might be mass produced from simpler forms than processed hydrocarbons. What might that side of the fossil fuel industry to look like in 50 or 100 years, from a technical perspective not political. Possibilities.
Well, you still need a carbon source because plastics are carbon-based. And presumably you'd need an "end of life cycle" plan as well if "carbon removal" is your ideological goal. This feedstock issue probably still REQUIRES fossil fuels.

Ultimately you still need energy to do ANY modification of ANY carbon feedstock to make plastics.
If it's not fossil, it probably needs to be nuclear because you need high density energy for most of the chemical processes that are not already fossil derived. This is where thermodynamically only nuclear can better fossil fuels. Green Energy is NOT going to cut it because it's high-entropy, low-density which generally is incompatible with 19th/20th/21st century industrial processes and supply chains.

If both of these are no-go with your ideology, then the only solution is natural polymers - e.g. plant cellulose (e.g. cotton) and animal fibers (e.g. wool). There are no pre-19th century technologies or processes that can do better. The 19th century did better them but only with fossil fuels and feedstocks.
 
  • Informative
Likes Bystander
This company is making a substitute for styrofoam out of mushrooms, the processes behind it really are quite fascinating and the company is beginning to make the enterprise quite commmercially viable (they are also growing mushroom bacon too):

 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K