Synthetic plastics without fossil fuels

  • Thread starter Thread starter robynmc
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential for producing synthetic plastics and other polymers without relying on fossil fuels. Participants explore various materials, methods, and future possibilities for mass production, considering both technical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about resources related to synthetic plastics and express uncertainty about how to frame their questions regarding alternatives to processed hydrocarbons.
  • Rayon and cellophane are mentioned as starting points for discussion about non-fossil fuel-based plastics.
  • Bioplastics are suggested as a current alternative, though some participants note that they are expensive and highlight practical challenges such as sourcing raw materials and recyclability.
  • One participant questions whether scaled-up chemical laboratories could ever replace traditional oil refining entirely, raising concerns about the feasibility of such a transition.
  • Another participant emphasizes the necessity of a carbon source for plastics and discusses the energy requirements for chemical processes, suggesting that nuclear energy may be a more viable option than green energy for industrial applications.
  • A company producing a styrofoam substitute from mushrooms is mentioned, highlighting innovative approaches to creating viable alternatives to traditional plastics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with some supporting the exploration of bioplastics and alternative materials, while others raise concerns about the practicality and energy requirements of these approaches. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the feasibility of completely displacing fossil fuel-derived plastics.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations related to the current state of technology, economic viability, and the energy density required for industrial processes. There is an acknowledgment of the need for a carbon source and the challenges associated with transitioning away from fossil fuels.

robynmc
Messages
8
Reaction score
6
Could you help me find resources about this? I searched synthetic industrial plastics and it didn't return much.
I'm not that sure how to frame the question, what the question is. I'm interested to know how/whether plastics and other polymers and so on might be mass produced from simpler forms than processed hydrocarbons. What might that side of the fossil fuel industry to look like in 50 or 100 years, from a technical perspective not political. Possibilities.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Rayon. Cellophane. Where do you wish to start?
 
Try searching bioplastics. It's being done right now, but at high cost. The first page of results has information about the chemistry, sources of the raw materials, recyclability, and land needed. Possibilities, yes, but practical realities override wishful thinking.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Isopod, berkeman and hutchphd
hutchphd said:
Rayon. Cellophane. Where do you wish to start?
Trying to work out what i want to know, as I say, but for example I've heard it suggested high grade plastics are an end to which the rest of oil refining is almost just an economy of scale. Is it feasible that scaled up chem labs will ever displace refinery sources entirely? Even in principle
 
jrmichler said:
Try searching bioplastics. It's being done right now, but at high cost. The first page of results has information about the chemistry, sources of the raw materials, recyclability, and land needed. Possibilities, yes, but practical realities override wishful thinking.
Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and hutchphd
robynmc said:
Could you help me find resources about this? I searched synthetic industrial plastics and it didn't return much.
I'm not that sure how to frame the question, what the question is. I'm interested to know how/whether plastics and other polymers and so on might be mass produced from simpler forms than processed hydrocarbons. What might that side of the fossil fuel industry to look like in 50 or 100 years, from a technical perspective not political. Possibilities.
Well, you still need a carbon source because plastics are carbon-based. And presumably you'd need an "end of life cycle" plan as well if "carbon removal" is your ideological goal. This feedstock issue probably still REQUIRES fossil fuels.

Ultimately you still need energy to do ANY modification of ANY carbon feedstock to make plastics.
If it's not fossil, it probably needs to be nuclear because you need high density energy for most of the chemical processes that are not already fossil derived. This is where thermodynamically only nuclear can better fossil fuels. Green Energy is NOT going to cut it because it's high-entropy, low-density which generally is incompatible with 19th/20th/21st century industrial processes and supply chains.

If both of these are no-go with your ideology, then the only solution is natural polymers - e.g. plant cellulose (e.g. cotton) and animal fibers (e.g. wool). There are no pre-19th century technologies or processes that can do better. The 19th century did better them but only with fossil fuels and feedstocks.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Bystander
This company is making a substitute for styrofoam out of mushrooms, the processes behind it really are quite fascinating and the company is beginning to make the enterprise quite commmercially viable (they are also growing mushroom bacon too):

 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K