MHB System of Equations: (2x-1)(2y-1)

juantheron
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
If a\;,b\;,x\;,y satisfy \begin{Bmatrix} ax+by=4\\\\ <br /> ax^2+by^2=-3 \\\\ <br /> ax^3+by^3=-3 \\\\ <br /> \end{Bmatrix}. Then (2x-1)(2y-1)=
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
jacks said:
If a\;,b\;,x\;,y satisfy \begin{Bmatrix} ax+by=4\\\\ <br /> ax^2+by^2=-3 \\\\ <br /> ax^3+by^3=-3 \\\\ <br /> \end{Bmatrix}. Then (2x-1)(2y-1)=
Solve the first two equations for $a$ and $b$. You should get $a = \dfrac{4y+3}{x(y-x)}$, $b = \dfrac{-4x-3}{y(y-x)}.$ Now substitute those values of $a$ and $b$ into the third equation. That should lead to $4xy+3x+3y-3=0.$

At that point I run into trouble. The best that you can deduce about $(2x-1)(2y-1)$ from that last equation is that $(2x-1)(2y-1) = 4-5(x+y)$, which does not seem like a satisfactory answer. If instead the question had asked for $\bigl(2x+\frac32\bigr)\bigl(2y+\frac32\bigr)$ then you could have re-written $4xy+3x+3y-3$ as $\bigl(2x+\frac32\bigr)\bigl(2y+\frac32\bigr) -\frac{21}4$ to give the answer $21/4$, which somehow seems to be more like the sort of conclusion that the question calls for.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top