MHB T 4–4 Deposits needed to accumulate a future sum

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Future Sum
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
T 4–4 Deposits needed to accumulate a future sum Judi wishes to accumulate \$8,000 by the end of 5 years by making equal annual end-of-year deposits over the next 5 years. If Judi can earn 7% on her investments, how much must she deposit at the end of each year to meet this goal?

$$\displaystyle A=P\left(1+\frac{r}{n}\right)^{nt}$$

ok not sure how plug this in

this complicated by the deposit made at the end of each year
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let's let $D$ be the amount of the end of year deposits, and $i$ be the annual interest rate. So, the amount of the account at the end of year $n$ can be given by the difference equation:

$$A_n-(1+i)A_{n-1}=D$$ where $n\in\mathbb{N}$

The homogeneous solution is given by:

$$h_n=k_1(1+i)^n$$

And the particular solution is:

$$p_n=k_2$$

Plugging this into our difference equation, we find:

$$k_2-(1+i)k_2=D\implies k_2=-\frac{D}{i}$$

And so the closed form for $A_n$ is given by:

$$A_n=k_1(1+i)^n-\frac{D}{i}$$

Since:

$$A_1=D$$

We find:

$$k_1=\frac{D}{i}$$

And so the closed-form for $A_n$ is

$$A_n=\frac{D}{i}\left((1+i)^n-1\right)$$

Solve for $D$:

$$D=\frac{A_ni}{(1+i)^n-1}$$
 
good grief,,😎
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top