Take the "Extremely Cool IQ Test" Now!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tigers2B1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cool Iq Test
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around an online IQ test that utilizes flash movies, with participants sharing their scores and experiences. The conversation touches on the perceived accuracy of the test, the impact of the timer, and the nature of IQ testing in general.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants report high scores, such as 164 and 172, but express skepticism about the test's accuracy.
  • Others mention that the timer adds pressure, potentially affecting concentration and performance.
  • A few participants suggest that the test may not accurately measure IQ, particularly for those scoring above average.
  • Some participants note that the test's scoring system seems arbitrary, with one suggesting it might assign points randomly based on IP addresses.
  • There are discussions about the visibility of instructions due to monitor contrast, which some believe could influence scores.
  • Several participants express that the test is entertaining despite doubts about its validity.
  • Some participants report selecting answers randomly and receiving low scores, while others mention improving their scores with different strategies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not agree on the test's validity and accuracy, with multiple competing views on its effectiveness as a measure of intelligence. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of the scores and the nature of IQ testing.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the scoring criteria and the test's design, with some suggesting that the test may not be suitable for accurately gauging intelligence across a broad range.

Tigers2B1
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't get it. I scored a 140.
 
164. I'd say this isn't the most accurate test available, but it is cool
 
I did not find it that cool!
 
that's because you don't know what cool is. jk
Instead of cool, how about if I say it was different than other iq tests I've taken online. I liked the timer on each question and I liked that it was more challenging than others. However, I think there should have been a place to put in my age.
 
Extraterrestrial Tribdog,huh...??I'm still earthly...

Daniel.
 
bluescreened around question 10 the first time and scored 149 the second, so I'm guessing my score would have been somewhere below that the first time.

Interesting test though. The timer makes you sort of panic and lose your concentration
 
164...I have got that score on another iq test before, but it's more logic than the other tests I took. I think iq should be a more rounded score than just logic.
 
I scored a 145 which is about average for how I do on these online type things.
 
  • #10
took it again and got 172, haven't tried a third time.
 
  • #11
Thought I did terribly (was clueless on a couple questions, so clicked almost arbitrarily), but I got 172. I'm sure this test is just wrong.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
turns out it's not a test on how correct you are, but how fast you can click your mouse.
 
  • #13
I selected random answers all the way through: 65

The timer is distracting and shouldn't be shown.
 
  • #14
The test is probably only remotely accurate in the average-gifted range, or probably 80-140. I never held the opinion that IQ tests with that sort of (comparatively low) ceiling on them could accurately gauge people who score a great majority of the questions right.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #15
vsage said:
The test is probably only remotely accurate in the average-gifted range, or probably 80-140. I never held the opinion that IQ tests with that sort of (comparatively low) ceiling on them could accurately gauge people who score a great majority of the questions right.

oh, you mean silly huemaans. yes I agree.
 
  • #16
IQ tests are not really my interest though i occasionally give every free test that exists (if they are free, there should be no harm right) :p

Anyways i got enough points to solve Fermats Last Theorem.
Beware wiles your proof will be rendered useless with my incredibly simple proof (goes and digs out the fermats lost book from his backyard). (Smart! aint i? or aint i?)

-- AI
 
  • #17
This is strange. I scored 172 too. That makes 3 of us having that score.

The test is definitely wrong.
 
  • #18
Maybe it asserts points,not function of the answers given,but randomly to IP-s...Mine was small ranked and only got 131 points...Yeah,maybe i should change my net connection...

Daniel.
 
  • #19
dextercioby said:
Maybe it asserts points,not function of the answers given,but randomly to IP-s...Mine was small ranked and only got 131 points...Yeah,maybe i should change my net connection...

Daniel.
that would be the intelligent thing to do, so maybe you should come up with somthing else. 131? that's almost average. Average people are way dumber than most. <--lol, that's funny
 
  • #20
By the way, what is the criterion of points for moron, average, intelligent etc. based on this test.
 
  • #21
well, i got 138. it says it is good but i don't think so. anyways it was my first time. i'll try it again.
 
  • #22
Tribby,it's good to be dumb,trust me,you get less publicity and you have more time for yourself...:wink:

Daniel,the regular dumb

...a$$...:-p
 
  • #23
The test starts at 0, goes up to 215 and you get a few points per question. Interesting that it is easy to get a negative score on this test.
 
  • #24
Ah, no, it goes higher! At least 223. Also there is a lot of white text which my monitor doesn't pick up; you can zoom into read it though you have to strain, or you can right-click and turn on "options." There are instructions for every problem.
 
  • #25
Also, by right-clicking and then clicking "print," you can pause it and get unlimited time on a question. --or you can unclick the "play" checkmark for the same effect
 
Last edited:
  • #26
And in the "your score" box at the end you can type in any value you want.
 
  • #27
IQ tests such as these are not valid; in fact IQ tests are quite worthless in my opinion except for establishing a concrete basis for mental retardation. They are usually created by someone involved in IQ societies.
 
  • #28
I am curious about that white text--for those of you who have taken the test, were you able to see the instructions? I see a sharp divide between 170ish scores and 140ish scores--is that a result of monitor contrast?
 
  • #29
vikasj007 said:
well, i got 138. it says it is good but i don't think so. anyways it was my first time. i'll try it again.

in my second try i got 172. :approve:

this test may not be very correct but it sure is fun.

though, i don't have any clue about #20.
 
  • #30
awww.. 115 stupid me stupid me.. maybe 'cause I wasn't lookin to the monitor?
 

Similar threads

Is this IQ test a reliable measure of intelligence?
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
What Are the Best High-IQ Websites for Tests and Resources?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Henri poincare got a 35 on an iq test?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
14K
I have become obsessed with taking IQ tests on the internet. Are any accurate?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
Why Do Kids Prefer Watching Other Kids in Hollywood?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Is My IQ Really Only 115? A Conundrum of Intelligence
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
11K
Cooling a marine engine while testing
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Is there a reliable IQ test out there?
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
26K
What Truly Defines Intelligence Beyond IQ Tests?
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
Electronics What's wrong with my TPS? [Throttle Position Sensor]
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K