MHB Tan (Theta - Pie) Answer Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter captainnumber36
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Trig
AI Thread Summary
Tan(theta - pi) equals tan(theta) due to the periodic nature of the tangent function, which has a period of pi radians. This means that tan(theta + pi) and tan(theta - pi) both simplify to tan(theta). The discussion clarifies that the use of "pie" was a misunderstanding, as "pi" is the correct term in this mathematical context. The tangent function's properties confirm that the initial assertion about the value being tan(theta) is accurate. Thus, the answer to Tan(theta - pi) is indeed tan(theta).
captainnumber36
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
What does Tan (Theta - Pie) = ?

I know Tan (theta + pie) = tan (theta).

They say the answer is tan (theta), but I think it's some kind of typo.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
captainnumber36 said:
What does Tan (Theta - Pie) = ?

I know Tan (theta + pie) = tan (theta).

They say the answer is tan (theta), but I think it's some kind of typo.

Pie is a dessert, while pi is a Greek letter used to represent the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter. Having said that, the period of the tangent function is $\pi$ radians, which means:

$$\tan(\theta+\pi k)=\tan(\theta)$$ where $k\in\mathbb{Z}$ (this means $k$ can be any integer, even negative ones)

So, it's not a typo, your book is correct.
 
captainnumber36 said:
What does Tan (Theta - Pie) = ?

I know Tan (theta + pie) = tan (theta).

They say the answer is tan (theta), but I think it's some kind of typo.

sum/difference identity for tangent ...

$\tan(a \pm b) = \dfrac{\tan{a} \pm \tan{b}}{1 \mp \tan{a} \cdot \tan{b}}$

now, let $a = \theta$ and $b = \pi$ ... substitute & evaluate
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top