MHB TEST OF HYPOTHESIS INVOLVING THE POPULATION MEAN š WHEN THE VARIANCE IS UNKNOWN

What is the null and alternative hypothesis???

  • H_0 = u = 9 ; H_\alpha = u > 9

  • H_O = u \geq 10 ; H_\alpha = u < 10


Results are only viewable after voting.
bunnypatotie
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
1. You are working in a company facing attrition problems of the customer service representatives for the past five years. The company president proposed that if the attrition rate is at least 10 per month, then the salary scale, compensation package, and professional development programs for employees will be initiated. For this purpose, attrition rates for 20 months selected at random were considered and listed below. Assume that the data follow normality.
8 9 12 10 6 15 14 11 8 10 10 12 15 11 12 7 14 14 7 11
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bunnypatotie said:
1. You are working in a company facing attrition problems of the customer service representatives for the past five years. The company president proposed that if the attrition rate is at least 10 per month, then the salary scale, compensation package, and professional development programs for employees will be initiated. For this purpose, attrition rates for 20 months selected at random were considered and listed below. Assume that the data follow normality.
8 9 12 10 6 15 14 11 8 10 10 12 15 11 12 7 14 14 7 11
Why is this a poll? There should be an unambiguous answer. That's why you are asking, isn't it?

Please show us what you've been able to do with this so far.

-Dan
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gƶdel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
46
Views
13K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top