Testing Flat Plate in Wind Tunnel: Uncertainty & Lift Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter sid_galt
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on testing a flat plate in a wind tunnel, revealing that the maximum lift reaches 250 g, with measurement uncertainty fluctuating between 20-50 g due to vibrations. Participants noted that lift continues to increase up to 45-50 degrees, contrary to expected stall behavior. The use of smoke wands was suggested to visualize airflow separation, and the need for flow straighteners was emphasized to reduce turbulence caused by the fan, which is positioned 3 ft from the wing section. The setup involves a straight section tunnel measuring 2 by 2 ft in cross-section and 4 ft in length, with a mechanical lift force sensor in use.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wind tunnel testing principles
  • Familiarity with lift force measurement techniques
  • Knowledge of airflow visualization methods, such as smoke wands
  • Experience with flow straighteners and their impact on turbulence
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the design and implementation of flow straighteners in wind tunnels
  • Learn about the effects of angle of attack on lift and stall characteristics
  • Investigate methods to minimize measurement uncertainty in wind tunnel experiments
  • Explore the use of digital sensors for more accurate lift force measurements
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, wind tunnel technicians, and researchers involved in aerodynamic testing and analysis will benefit from this discussion.

sid_galt
Messages
502
Reaction score
1
I am trying to test a flat plate in a wind tunnel. The uncertainty in measurement is 50 g and the maximum lift comes to 250 g. The problem is that even after 25-30 degrees as the angle keeps on increasing, the lift too keeps on increasing instead of decreasing and tops at around 45-50 degrees and then decreases.
Any idea why this could be happening?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It seems like you are not measuring lift any longer, but the reaction force due to the momentum of the oncoming air stream. Are you using a smoke wand or do you have tethers on the back face of the plate so you can see when separation is occurring?
 
I am not using smoke currently but will be doing so tomorrow. I was thinking of burning wood behind the fan but I doubt it would give fine streamlines. Would it? If not then I will go for the smoke wands (they are oil burning wires right?).But isn't this the way lift is measured in actual wind tunnels. The lift in professional wind tunnels must be dropping at stall. Otherwise how do they obtain their measurements for angles at or greater than the stall angle.
 
Last edited:
I tried smoke and although it is showing very faint contrails, it was enough to see that the wing was stalling.

On the other hand, how do I get the reading for stall on the sensor.

The balance I am using gives an uncertainty of about 20-25 g for measurement but the vibrations in the tunnel are increasing this to 45-50 g.
Any thoughts on reducing this.

The fan is a bit close to the wing section, approx. 3 ft. away. Is it too close? What should be the ideal distance?
 
I'm glad the smoke worked for you. Hopefully the onset of stall was well below the 45° point.

Sid said:
On the other hand, how do I get the reading for stall on the sensor.
What sensor are you referring to? The lift force sensor?

Sid said:
The balance I am using gives an uncertainty of about 20-25 g for measurement but the vibrations in the tunnel are increasing this to 45-50 g.
Any thoughts on reducing this.
Does your tunnes have any egg crates/flow straighteners in it? I am assuming that it is a straight section tunnel, not a closed circuit tunnel. Is it an old piece of equipment? It could be anything.

Sid said:
The fan is a bit close to the wing section, approx. 3 ft. away. Is it too close? What should be the ideal distance?
Since I don't know the size of your tunnel it is tough to say. It does sound a bit close to me. That, to me, further adds to the need for flow straighteners.
 
Thank you for the reply.

FredGarvin said:
I'm glad the smoke worked for you. Hopefully the onset of stall was well below the 45° point.
Yeah. It was around 20 degrees.

FredGarvin said:
What sensor are you referring to? The lift force sensor?
Yes

FredGarvin said:
Does your tunnes have any egg crates/flow straighteners in it? I am assuming that it is a straight section tunnel, not a closed circuit tunnel. Is it an old piece of equipment? It could be anything.

It is a straight section tunnel rather small in length.
It has gauzed wire between the fan and the wing section. By egg crates do you mean a honeycomb? I tried making one but failed because the pressure loss was getting too high.

FredGarvin said:
Since I don't know the size of your tunnel it is tough to say. It does sound a bit close to me. That, to me, further adds to the need for flow straighteners.

The size is 2 by 2 ft cross section and 4 ft length.
 
By egg crates I do mean honeycomb. I would think that if you are that close to the fan, you are getting way too much turbulence from the fan. I think you would benefit from getting some kind of flow straightener in there. Perrhaps if you increased the cell size and cut down on the length from what you tried before you could reduce the delta p across it.

There is also a possibility that you have, by pure luck, excited a mode (natural frequency) in the plate.

Is your sensor a mechanical or digital type?
 
It's a mechanical sensor.

As for natural frequency, I don't think so as I tried the experiment with two different sections of different shapes and materials and the trend was still the same - the lift was not decreasing at stall.
 
Is it a blow down or suck through tunnel. I am a TA using a open loop tunnel and the turbulence can be quite severe (and frustrating) when the plate is to close to the wall you might be creating 'ground effect' do you measure drag force too?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
11K
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
10K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K