Testing the Validity of Arguments

  • Thread starter Thread starter Procrastinate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Testing
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the validity of arguments in Boolean algebra, specifically focusing on the interpretation of statements and their logical structure. Participants are examining a scenario involving characters named Jay, Leon, and May, and how their emotional states relate to the truth of certain propositions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to analyze the validity of an argument based on the relationships between statements. There are questions regarding the correct identification of antecedents and the structure of implications. Some participants express frustration over repeated attempts to arrive at a valid conclusion.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the argument's validity, with some participants providing guidance on the correct interpretation of statements. Multiple interpretations of the relationships between characters and their emotional states are being discussed, but a clear consensus has not been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the information they can share. There is mention of specific lines in their working that are causing confusion, particularly regarding the antecedents in their logical statements.

Procrastinate
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
Boolean Algebra:

Everyone will now about the situation once Jay starts gossiping. Leon is upset because everyone knows about the situation. Since Leon is upset, May is unhappy. Therefore, May is unhappy when Jay starts gossiping.


I attached my working and I said it was invalid as line 15 was false. However, the argument is vaild. I have done this thrice and I still get line 15 false. Perhaps there is something in my working?
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
"Everyone will now about the situation once Jay starts gossiping"

"Jay starts gossiping" suppose to be the antecede,

same goes for others, you interpret it incorrectly, if I'm not wrong
 
Last edited:
annoymage said:
"Everyone will now about the situation once Jay starts gossiping"

"Jay starts gossiping" suppose to be the antecede,

same goes for others, you interpret it incorrectly, if I'm not wrong

I swapped them all around and I still got an invalid argument...I wrote it on paper this time and it was the second line. I am in my throes of pain here.

Situation -> S
Jay -> J
May -> M
Leon -> L

(I didn't put the statements here, but you know what I mean)

J->S
S->L
M->L
-----
J->M


Is this right?
 
you change it correctly except

"Since Leon is upset, May is unhappy."

any word after "since" should be the antecede.

try it again, it should be right
 
annoymage said:
you change it correctly except

"Since Leon is upset, May is unhappy."

any word after "since" should be the antecede.

try it again, it should be right

Thank you, I got it right this time.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K