MHB The area of a triangle and determinants

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the area of a triangle can be represented by a determinant formed by its three vertices. The original poster encounters issues with sign discrepancies in their proof, specifically regarding the orientation of the triangle. It is clarified that the determinant yields double the area for a counter-clockwise orientation, while a clockwise orientation results in a negative value. This indicates that the signs in the formulas must be adjusted based on the triangle's orientation. Understanding these orientation effects is crucial for aligning the two area representations.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I was trying to prove that the area of a triangle is equal to the determinant consisting of the three points of the triangle. I got to the end, and something ain't working out. The signs are all wrong.

In the attached pictures I include my proof. Can you please tell me how can the two formulas be identical ? The first is the area coming from trapezoid subtraction , while the second is the determinant.

Thank you !

Clarification: when I say signs are opposite, I mean (y2-y3) vs. (y3-y2) , etc...

View attachment 7656

View attachment 7657

View attachment 7658

View attachment 7659
 

Attachments

  • 1.PNG
    1.PNG
    28.4 KB · Views: 107
  • 2.PNG
    2.PNG
    17.7 KB · Views: 117
  • 3.PNG
    3.PNG
    4.9 KB · Views: 105
  • 4.PNG
    4.PNG
    7.1 KB · Views: 118
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Yankel,

The determinant gives double the area of a triangle that is oriented counter-clockwise.
In your case the triangle is oriented clockwise, meaning that we'll find the opposite.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top