I The coefficient of expansion for spin addition

hokhani
Messages
552
Reaction score
15
TL;DR Summary
Addition of spins
In the following expansion how to find the coefficients ##\alpha## and ##\beta##?
$$|S, S_z\rangle = \alpha |S+1/2, S_z+1/2\rangle \otimes |1/2,-1/2\rangle + \beta |S+1/2, S_z-1/2\rangle \otimes |1/2,+1/2\rangle$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hokhani said:
In the following expansion
Where are you getting this from?
 
PeterDonis said:
Where are you getting this from?
I try to derive the third equation in Eq. (B2) in the appendix of the paper "https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.21.1003"
So, I think these two equations are equivalent. Please help me if I am wrong.
 
We can use the chapter on spin from Grififths' Introduction to Quantum Mechanics to solve this problem. Define ##\vec{S}## as the total spin operator, with components ##S_x##, ##S_y## and ##S_z##. Also define the spin raising and lowering operators as ##S_\pm = S_x \pm i S_y\,##. For a state ##\ket{s,m}## we then have (in units of ##\hbar=1##):
$$
\begin{aligned}
S^2 \ket{s,m} = s(s+1)\ket{s,m}, \quad S_z \ket{s,m} = m\ket{s,m} \\[0.8em] \quad S_\pm \ket{s,m} = \sqrt{s(s+1)-m(m\pm1)} \ket{s,m\pm1}
\end{aligned} \tag 1$$To solve this problem, we will check that both the LHS and RHS have the same eigenvalue under ##S^2##. This will give us ##\alpha## and ##\beta## (up to an overall phase factor).

I'll introduce a little notation here. We will say that the RHS state is ##\ket\chi##, which is defined as
$$
\begin{aligned}
&\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad \ket\chi = \alpha\ket{\chi_1} + \beta\ket{\chi_2}, \,\,\,\text{where} \\[0.8em]
&\ket{\chi_1} = \ket{s+1/2,m+1/2}\ket{1/2,-1/2}, \quad \ket{\chi_2} = \ket{s+1/2,m-1/2}\ket{1/2,1/2}
\end{aligned} \tag 2$$
The operator ##S^2## which now acts on both spin states of the RHS can be written as
$$S^2 = (S^{(1)})^2 + (S^{(2)})^2 + 2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)}$$ where the components ##S^{(1)}## and ##S^{(2)}## act on the spin-##s## and spin-##1/2## components of ##\ket\chi## respectively.

It will be helpful to express the product ##2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)}## in terms of the raising and lowering operators. With a little algebra, we have
$$
\begin{aligned}
2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)} &= 2 \left( S_x^{(1)}S_x^{(2)} + S_y^{(1)}S_y^{(2)} + S_z^{(1)}S_z^{(2)} \right) \\
&= \ldots \\
&= S_+^{(1)}S_-^{(2)} + S_-^{(1)}S_+^{(2)} + 2S_z^{(1)}S_z^{(2)}
\end{aligned}
\tag 3
$$Finally, we are ready to compute the effect of ##S^2## on ##\ket\chi##. Using equations (1), (2) and (3) we have
$$
\begin{aligned}
2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)} \ket{\chi_1} &= \sqrt{(s+1)^2-m^2} \ket{\chi_2} - (m+1/2)\ket{\chi_1} \\

2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)} \ket{\chi_2} &= \sqrt{(s+1)^2-m^2} \ket{\chi_1} + (m-1/2)\ket{\chi_2}
\end{aligned}
\tag 4
$$It is easy to see that ##\ket\chi## is an eigenstate of ##(S^{(1)})^2## and ##(S^{(2)})^2##, and we expect it to be an eigenstate of ##S^2## as well. Hence, it should be an eigenstate of ##\vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)}##. Observe that using (4), we can write
$$
2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)} \ket\chi = \alpha \left( -(m+1/2) + \frac \beta \alpha \sqrt{(\ldots)} \right) \ket{\chi_1} + \beta \left( (m-1/2) +\frac \alpha \beta \sqrt{(\ldots)} \right) \ket{\chi_2} \tag 5
$$Hence for ##\ket\chi## to be an eigenstate, we must have
$$
-(m+1/2) + \frac \beta \alpha \sqrt{(\ldots)} = (m-1/2) +\frac \alpha \beta \sqrt{(\ldots)} \tag 6
$$Solving for ##\beta/\alpha## yields
$$
\frac \beta \alpha = \frac{m \pm (s+1)}{\sqrt{(s+1)^2-m^2}} \tag 7
$$Substituting back into (5), we see that
$$
2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)} \ket\chi = (\pm s \pm 1 - 1/2) \ket\chi \tag 8
$$Computing the rest of ##S^2 \ket\chi## is simple:
$$
\begin{aligned}
S^2 \ket\chi &= (S^{(1)})^2 \ket\chi + (S^{(2)})^2 \ket\chi + 2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)} \ket\chi \\[0.8em]
&= (s+1/2)(s+3/2) \ket\chi + (1/2)(3/2) \ket\chi + (\pm s \pm 1 - 1/2) \ket\chi
\end{aligned}
\tag 9$$We want the negative case because it yields the eigenvalue ##s(s+1)##, which matches the eigenvalue when ##S^2## acts on ##\ket{s,m}##. Hence, we take the negative case of (7)
$$
\frac \beta \alpha = \frac{m-(s+1)}{\sqrt{ (s+1)^2 - m^2 }}
$$We can then use normalisation to obtain the coefficients ##\alpha## and ##\beta##. Because ##\ket{\chi_1}## and ##\ket{\chi_2}## are orthonormal (and that ##\ket{s,m}## is correctly normalised), we must have ##\alpha^2 + \beta^2 = 1##. After some more algebra, we obtain
$$
\alpha = \pm \sqrt{\frac{s+m+1}{2s+2}}, \quad \beta = \mp \sqrt{\frac{s-m+1}{2s+2}}
$$which matches the expression in the paper.
 
  • Like
Likes weirdoguy and hokhani
Thank you very much Jonomyster. It was great.
 
Last edited:
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
409
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top