I The coefficient of expansion for spin addition

hokhani
Messages
561
Reaction score
18
TL;DR Summary
Addition of spins
In the following expansion how to find the coefficients ##\alpha## and ##\beta##?
$$|S, S_z\rangle = \alpha |S+1/2, S_z+1/2\rangle \otimes |1/2,-1/2\rangle + \beta |S+1/2, S_z-1/2\rangle \otimes |1/2,+1/2\rangle$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hokhani said:
In the following expansion
Where are you getting this from?
 
PeterDonis said:
Where are you getting this from?
I try to derive the third equation in Eq. (B2) in the appendix of the paper "https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.21.1003"
So, I think these two equations are equivalent. Please help me if I am wrong.
 
We can use the chapter on spin from Grififths' Introduction to Quantum Mechanics to solve this problem. Define ##\vec{S}## as the total spin operator, with components ##S_x##, ##S_y## and ##S_z##. Also define the spin raising and lowering operators as ##S_\pm = S_x \pm i S_y\,##. For a state ##\ket{s,m}## we then have (in units of ##\hbar=1##):
$$
\begin{aligned}
S^2 \ket{s,m} = s(s+1)\ket{s,m}, \quad S_z \ket{s,m} = m\ket{s,m} \\[0.8em] \quad S_\pm \ket{s,m} = \sqrt{s(s+1)-m(m\pm1)} \ket{s,m\pm1}
\end{aligned} \tag 1$$To solve this problem, we will check that both the LHS and RHS have the same eigenvalue under ##S^2##. This will give us ##\alpha## and ##\beta## (up to an overall phase factor).

I'll introduce a little notation here. We will say that the RHS state is ##\ket\chi##, which is defined as
$$
\begin{aligned}
&\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad \ket\chi = \alpha\ket{\chi_1} + \beta\ket{\chi_2}, \,\,\,\text{where} \\[0.8em]
&\ket{\chi_1} = \ket{s+1/2,m+1/2}\ket{1/2,-1/2}, \quad \ket{\chi_2} = \ket{s+1/2,m-1/2}\ket{1/2,1/2}
\end{aligned} \tag 2$$
The operator ##S^2## which now acts on both spin states of the RHS can be written as
$$S^2 = (S^{(1)})^2 + (S^{(2)})^2 + 2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)}$$ where the components ##S^{(1)}## and ##S^{(2)}## act on the spin-##s## and spin-##1/2## components of ##\ket\chi## respectively.

It will be helpful to express the product ##2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)}## in terms of the raising and lowering operators. With a little algebra, we have
$$
\begin{aligned}
2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)} &= 2 \left( S_x^{(1)}S_x^{(2)} + S_y^{(1)}S_y^{(2)} + S_z^{(1)}S_z^{(2)} \right) \\
&= \ldots \\
&= S_+^{(1)}S_-^{(2)} + S_-^{(1)}S_+^{(2)} + 2S_z^{(1)}S_z^{(2)}
\end{aligned}
\tag 3
$$Finally, we are ready to compute the effect of ##S^2## on ##\ket\chi##. Using equations (1), (2) and (3) we have
$$
\begin{aligned}
2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)} \ket{\chi_1} &= \sqrt{(s+1)^2-m^2} \ket{\chi_2} - (m+1/2)\ket{\chi_1} \\

2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)} \ket{\chi_2} &= \sqrt{(s+1)^2-m^2} \ket{\chi_1} + (m-1/2)\ket{\chi_2}
\end{aligned}
\tag 4
$$It is easy to see that ##\ket\chi## is an eigenstate of ##(S^{(1)})^2## and ##(S^{(2)})^2##, and we expect it to be an eigenstate of ##S^2## as well. Hence, it should be an eigenstate of ##\vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)}##. Observe that using (4), we can write
$$
2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)} \ket\chi = \alpha \left( -(m+1/2) + \frac \beta \alpha \sqrt{(\ldots)} \right) \ket{\chi_1} + \beta \left( (m-1/2) +\frac \alpha \beta \sqrt{(\ldots)} \right) \ket{\chi_2} \tag 5
$$Hence for ##\ket\chi## to be an eigenstate, we must have
$$
-(m+1/2) + \frac \beta \alpha \sqrt{(\ldots)} = (m-1/2) +\frac \alpha \beta \sqrt{(\ldots)} \tag 6
$$Solving for ##\beta/\alpha## yields
$$
\frac \beta \alpha = \frac{m \pm (s+1)}{\sqrt{(s+1)^2-m^2}} \tag 7
$$Substituting back into (5), we see that
$$
2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)} \ket\chi = (\pm s \pm 1 - 1/2) \ket\chi \tag 8
$$Computing the rest of ##S^2 \ket\chi## is simple:
$$
\begin{aligned}
S^2 \ket\chi &= (S^{(1)})^2 \ket\chi + (S^{(2)})^2 \ket\chi + 2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)} \ket\chi \\[0.8em]
&= (s+1/2)(s+3/2) \ket\chi + (1/2)(3/2) \ket\chi + (\pm s \pm 1 - 1/2) \ket\chi
\end{aligned}
\tag 9$$We want the negative case because it yields the eigenvalue ##s(s+1)##, which matches the eigenvalue when ##S^2## acts on ##\ket{s,m}##. Hence, we take the negative case of (7)
$$
\frac \beta \alpha = \frac{m-(s+1)}{\sqrt{ (s+1)^2 - m^2 }}
$$We can then use normalisation to obtain the coefficients ##\alpha## and ##\beta##. Because ##\ket{\chi_1}## and ##\ket{\chi_2}## are orthonormal (and that ##\ket{s,m}## is correctly normalised), we must have ##\alpha^2 + \beta^2 = 1##. After some more algebra, we obtain
$$
\alpha = \pm \sqrt{\frac{s+m+1}{2s+2}}, \quad \beta = \mp \sqrt{\frac{s-m+1}{2s+2}}
$$which matches the expression in the paper.
 
  • Like
Likes weirdoguy and hokhani
Thank you very much Jonomyster. It was great.
 
Last edited:
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
471
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top