The coefficient of expansion for spin addition

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the coefficients ##\alpha## and ##\beta## in the spin addition formula, specifically from the equation $$|S, S_z\rangle = \alpha |S+1/2, S_z+1/2\rangle \otimes |1/2,-1/2\rangle + \beta |S+1/2, S_z-1/2\rangle \otimes |1/2,+1/2\rangle$$. The derivation utilizes the total spin operator ##\vec{S}## and the raising and lowering operators ##S_\pm##, referencing Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" and a specific paper from the Physical Review B journal. The final expressions for the coefficients are given as $$\alpha = \pm \sqrt{\frac{s+m+1}{2s+2}}$$ and $$\beta = \mp \sqrt{\frac{s-m+1}{2s+2}}$$, confirming their equivalence with the expressions found in the referenced paper.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics concepts, particularly spin states.
  • Familiarity with the total spin operator ##\vec{S}## and its components ##S_x##, ##S_y##, and ##S_z##.
  • Knowledge of raising and lowering operators ##S_\pm## in quantum mechanics.
  • Ability to work with eigenvalues and eigenstates in quantum systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of eigenvalues and eigenstates in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the implications of the total spin operator in multi-particle systems.
  • Explore the normalization conditions for quantum states and their significance.
  • Review the chapter on spin in Griffiths' "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" for deeper insights.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, graduate students in physics, and researchers focusing on spin systems and quantum mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

hokhani
Messages
581
Reaction score
20
TL;DR
Addition of spins
In the following expansion how to find the coefficients ##\alpha## and ##\beta##?
$$|S, S_z\rangle = \alpha |S+1/2, S_z+1/2\rangle \otimes |1/2,-1/2\rangle + \beta |S+1/2, S_z-1/2\rangle \otimes |1/2,+1/2\rangle$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hokhani said:
In the following expansion
Where are you getting this from?
 
We can use the chapter on spin from Grififths' Introduction to Quantum Mechanics to solve this problem. Define ##\vec{S}## as the total spin operator, with components ##S_x##, ##S_y## and ##S_z##. Also define the spin raising and lowering operators as ##S_\pm = S_x \pm i S_y\,##. For a state ##\ket{s,m}## we then have (in units of ##\hbar=1##):
$$
\begin{aligned}
S^2 \ket{s,m} = s(s+1)\ket{s,m}, \quad S_z \ket{s,m} = m\ket{s,m} \\[0.8em] \quad S_\pm \ket{s,m} = \sqrt{s(s+1)-m(m\pm1)} \ket{s,m\pm1}
\end{aligned} \tag 1$$To solve this problem, we will check that both the LHS and RHS have the same eigenvalue under ##S^2##. This will give us ##\alpha## and ##\beta## (up to an overall phase factor).

I'll introduce a little notation here. We will say that the RHS state is ##\ket\chi##, which is defined as
$$
\begin{aligned}
&\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad \ket\chi = \alpha\ket{\chi_1} + \beta\ket{\chi_2}, \,\,\,\text{where} \\[0.8em]
&\ket{\chi_1} = \ket{s+1/2,m+1/2}\ket{1/2,-1/2}, \quad \ket{\chi_2} = \ket{s+1/2,m-1/2}\ket{1/2,1/2}
\end{aligned} \tag 2$$
The operator ##S^2## which now acts on both spin states of the RHS can be written as
$$S^2 = (S^{(1)})^2 + (S^{(2)})^2 + 2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)}$$ where the components ##S^{(1)}## and ##S^{(2)}## act on the spin-##s## and spin-##1/2## components of ##\ket\chi## respectively.

It will be helpful to express the product ##2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)}## in terms of the raising and lowering operators. With a little algebra, we have
$$
\begin{aligned}
2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)} &= 2 \left( S_x^{(1)}S_x^{(2)} + S_y^{(1)}S_y^{(2)} + S_z^{(1)}S_z^{(2)} \right) \\
&= \ldots \\
&= S_+^{(1)}S_-^{(2)} + S_-^{(1)}S_+^{(2)} + 2S_z^{(1)}S_z^{(2)}
\end{aligned}
\tag 3
$$Finally, we are ready to compute the effect of ##S^2## on ##\ket\chi##. Using equations (1), (2) and (3) we have
$$
\begin{aligned}
2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)} \ket{\chi_1} &= \sqrt{(s+1)^2-m^2} \ket{\chi_2} - (m+1/2)\ket{\chi_1} \\

2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)} \ket{\chi_2} &= \sqrt{(s+1)^2-m^2} \ket{\chi_1} + (m-1/2)\ket{\chi_2}
\end{aligned}
\tag 4
$$It is easy to see that ##\ket\chi## is an eigenstate of ##(S^{(1)})^2## and ##(S^{(2)})^2##, and we expect it to be an eigenstate of ##S^2## as well. Hence, it should be an eigenstate of ##\vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)}##. Observe that using (4), we can write
$$
2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)} \ket\chi = \alpha \left( -(m+1/2) + \frac \beta \alpha \sqrt{(\ldots)} \right) \ket{\chi_1} + \beta \left( (m-1/2) +\frac \alpha \beta \sqrt{(\ldots)} \right) \ket{\chi_2} \tag 5
$$Hence for ##\ket\chi## to be an eigenstate, we must have
$$
-(m+1/2) + \frac \beta \alpha \sqrt{(\ldots)} = (m-1/2) +\frac \alpha \beta \sqrt{(\ldots)} \tag 6
$$Solving for ##\beta/\alpha## yields
$$
\frac \beta \alpha = \frac{m \pm (s+1)}{\sqrt{(s+1)^2-m^2}} \tag 7
$$Substituting back into (5), we see that
$$
2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)} \ket\chi = (\pm s \pm 1 - 1/2) \ket\chi \tag 8
$$Computing the rest of ##S^2 \ket\chi## is simple:
$$
\begin{aligned}
S^2 \ket\chi &= (S^{(1)})^2 \ket\chi + (S^{(2)})^2 \ket\chi + 2 \vec{S}^{(1)} \cdot \vec{S}^{(2)} \ket\chi \\[0.8em]
&= (s+1/2)(s+3/2) \ket\chi + (1/2)(3/2) \ket\chi + (\pm s \pm 1 - 1/2) \ket\chi
\end{aligned}
\tag 9$$We want the negative case because it yields the eigenvalue ##s(s+1)##, which matches the eigenvalue when ##S^2## acts on ##\ket{s,m}##. Hence, we take the negative case of (7)
$$
\frac \beta \alpha = \frac{m-(s+1)}{\sqrt{ (s+1)^2 - m^2 }}
$$We can then use normalisation to obtain the coefficients ##\alpha## and ##\beta##. Because ##\ket{\chi_1}## and ##\ket{\chi_2}## are orthonormal (and that ##\ket{s,m}## is correctly normalised), we must have ##\alpha^2 + \beta^2 = 1##. After some more algebra, we obtain
$$
\alpha = \pm \sqrt{\frac{s+m+1}{2s+2}}, \quad \beta = \mp \sqrt{\frac{s-m+1}{2s+2}}
$$which matches the expression in the paper.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy and hokhani
Thank you very much Jonomyster. It was great.
 
Last edited:
  • Care
Likes   Reactions: Jonomyster

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K